Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 283–289 | Cite as

Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units

  • Catherine M. Breen
  • Amy P. Abernethy
  • Katherine H. Abbott
  • James A. TulskyEmail author
Original Articles


OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and nature of interpersonal conflicts that arise when patients in the intensive care unit are considered for limitation of life-sustaining treatment.

DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of prospectively gathered interviews.

SETTING: Six intensive care units at a university medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred six physicians and nurses who were involved in the care of 102 patients for whom withdrawal or withholding of treatment was considered.

MEASUREMENTS: Semistructured interviews addressed disagreements during life-sustaining treatment decision making. Two raters coded transcripts of the audiotaped interviews.

MAIN RESULTS: At least 1 health care provider in 78% of the cases described a situation coded as conflict. Conflict occurred between the staff and family members in 48% of the cases, among staff members in 48%, and among family members in 24%. In 63% of the cases, conflict arose over the decision about life-sustaining treatment itself. In 45% of the cases, conflict occurred over other tasks such as communication and pain control. Social issues caused conflict in 19% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS: Conflict is more prevalent in the setting of intensive care decision making than has previously been demonstrated. While conflict over the treatment decision itself is most common, conflict over other issues, including social issues, is also significant. By identifying conflict and by recognizing that the treatment decision may not be the only conflict present, or even the main one, clinicians may address conflict more constructively.

Key Words

conflict (psychology) terminal care decision making life support care resuscitation orders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cameron M. Moral and ethical component of nurse-burnout. Nurs Manage. 1986;17:42B,42D,42E.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edwards BS. When the physician won’t give up. Am J Nurs. 1993;93:34–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forte PS. High cost of conflict. Nurs Econ. 1997;15:119–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kohr R, Creces L, Gray V, Warnock L. Defusing family conflicts. Nursing 1998;28:54–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jezewski MA. Do-not-resuscitate status: conflict and culture brokering in critical care units. Heart Lung. 1994;23:458–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jezewski MA, Finnell DS. The meaning of DNR status: oncology nurses’ experiences with patients and families. Cancer Nurs. 1998;21:212–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jezewski MA, Scherer Y, Miller C, Battista E. Consenting to DNR: critical care nurses’ interactions with patients and family members. Am J Crit Care. 1993;2:302–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shreves JG, Moss AH. Residents’ ethical disagreements with attending physicians: an unrecognized problem. Acad Med. 1996;71:1103–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winkenwerder W. Ethical dilemmas for house staff physicians. The care of critically ill and dying patients. JAMA. 1985;254:3454–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lo B, Saika G, Strull W, Thomas E, Showstack J. ‘Do not resuscitate’ decisions: a prospective study at three teaching hospitals. Arch Intern Med. 1984;145:1115–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:309–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:15–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, McCarthy L, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ. A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1324–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O. Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:266–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cook DJ, Giacomini M, Johnson N, Willms D. Life support in the intensive care unit: a qualitative investigation of technological purposes. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. CMAJ. 1999;161:1109–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Disagreements that arise when making decisions about withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 1):101.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1992.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ellis DG, Fisher BA. Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rahim MA. Managing Conflict in Organizations. 2nd ed. Westport, Conn: Praeger; 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Falk G. An empirical study measuring conflict in problem-solving groups which are assigned different decision rules. Hum Relations. 1982;35:1123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dubler NN, Marcus LJ. Mediating Bioethical Disputes: A Practical Guide. New York: United Hospital Fund of New York; 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Corley MC. Ethical dimensions of nurse-physician relations in critical care. Nurs Clin North Am. 1998;33:325–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal/withholding of life sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:197–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levine C, Zuckerman C. Trouble with families: toward an ethic of accommodation. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:148–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katz J. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: The Free Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolf SM. Conflict between doctor and patient. Law Med Health Care. 1988;16:197–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Orentlicher D. The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions. JAMA. 1992;267:2101–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nelson JL. Families and futility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:879–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lo B, Quill T, Tulsky J. Discussing palliative care with patients. ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:744–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goold SD, Williams B, Arnold RM. Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: a differential diagnosis. JAMA. 2000;283:909–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Forrow L, Arnold RM, Parker LS. Preventive ethics: expanding the horizons of clinical ethics. J Clin Ethics. 1993;4:287–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dowdy MD, Robertson C, Bander JA. A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay. Crit Care Med. 1998;26: 252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine M. Breen
    • 2
  • Amy P. Abernethy
    • 3
  • Katherine H. Abbott
    • 1
  • James A. Tulsky
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Received from the Program on the Medical Encounter and Palliative CareVA Medical CenterDurham
  2. 2.Department of PathologyVA Medical CenterDurham
  3. 3.Department of MedicineVA Medical CenterDurham
  4. 4.Center for the Study of Aging and Human DevelopmentVA Medical CenterDurham
  5. 5.Institute on Care at the End of LifeDuke UniversityDurham

Personalised recommendations