Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 129–133 | Cite as

Evidence-based medicine training in internal medicine residency programs

A national survey
Brief Report

Abstract

To characterize evidence-based medicine (EBM) curricula in internal medicine residency programs, a written survey was mailed to 417 program directors of U.S. internal medicine residency programs. For programs offering a freestanding (dedicated curricular time) EBM curriculum, the survey inquired about its objectives, format, curricular time, attendance, faculty development, resources, and evaluation. All directors responded to questions regarding integrating EBM teaching into established educational venues. Of 417 program directors, 269 (65%) responded. Of these 269 programs, 99 (37%) offered a freestanding EBM curriculum. Among these, the most common objectives were performing critical appraisal (78%), searching for evidence (53%), posing a focused question (44%), and applying the evidence in decision making (35%). Although 97% of the programs provided medline, only 33% provided Best Evidence or the Cochrane Library. Evaluation was performed in 37% of the freestanding curricula. Considering all respondents, most programs reported efforts to integrate EBM teaching into established venues, including attending rounds (84%), resident report (82%), continuity clinic (76%), bedside rounds (68%), and emergency department (35%). However, only 51% to 64% of the programs provided on-site electronic information and 31% to 45% provided site-specific faculty development. One third of the training programs reported offering freestanding EBM curricula, which commonly targeted important EBM skills, utilized the residents’ experiences, and employed an interactive format. Less than one half of the curricula however, included curriculum evaluation, and many failed to provide important medical information sources. Most programs reported efforts to integrate EBM teaching, but many of these attempts lacked important structural elements.

Key words

evidence-based medicine residency programs curriculum graduate medical education survey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Muir Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellis J, Mulligan I, Rowe J, Sackett DL. Inpatient medicine is evidence based. Lancet. 1995;346:407–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:596–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorman PN, Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:113–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Walker-Dilks CJ, et al. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical enduser and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990;23:583–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, et al. Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists. JAMA. 1991;266:1103–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, Thibault G, Goldman L. Adverse outcomes of underuse of beta-blockers in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1997;277:115–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Program requirements for residency education in internal medicine: special educational requirements. In: The Graduate Medical Education Directory, 1996–97. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1996:79.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muller S (chairman). Physicians for the twenty-first century: report of the project panel on the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine. J Med Educ. 1984;59(pt 2):127–8,155–67.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sidorov J. How are internal medicine residency journal clubs organized and what makes them successful? Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1193–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green ML. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-medicine: a critical review of curricula. Acad Med. 1999;74:686–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman GR, Shannon SI. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. CMAJ. 1998;158:177–81.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alguire P. A review of journal clubs in postgraduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:347–53.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reilly B, Lemon M. Evidence-based morning report: a popular new format in a large teaching hospital. Am J Med. 1997;103:419–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green ML, Ellis PJ. Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:742–50.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sacket DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1997:3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knowles M. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, Tex: Gulf Publishing Co; 1984.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Sytematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sackett DL, Straus SE. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the “evidence cart”. JAMA. 1998;280:1336–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flynn C, Helwig A. Evaluating an evidence-based medicine curriculum. Acad Med. 1997;72:454–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grimes DA. Introducing evidence-based medicine into a department of obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:451–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicinethe Yale Primary Care Residency Program, Yale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  2. 2.Waterbury and St. Mary’s HospitalsWaterbury

Personalised recommendations