OBJECTIVE: To compare primary care providers’ depression-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices and to understand how these reports vary for providers in staff or group-model managed care organizations (MCOs) compared with network-model MCOs including independent practice associations and preferred provider organizations.
DESIGN: Survey of primary care providers’ depression-related practices in 1996.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed 410 providers, from 80 outpatient clinics, in 11 MCOs participating in four studies designed to improve the quality of depression care in primary care.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured knowledge based on depression guidelines, attitudes (beliefs about burden, skill, and barriers) related to depression, and reported behavior. Providers in both types of MCO are equally knowledgeable about treating depression (better knowledge of pharmacologic than psychotherapeutic treatments) and perceive equivalent skills in treating depression. However, compared with network-model providers, staff/group-model providers have stronger beliefs that treating depression is burdensome to their practice. While more staff/group-model providers reported time limitations as a barrier to optimal depression treatment, more network-model providers reported limited access to mental health specialty referral as a barrier. Accordingly, these staff/group-model providers are more likely to treat patients with major depression through referral (51% vs 38%) or to assess but not treat (17% vs 7%), and network-model providers are more likely to prescribe antidepressants (57% vs 6%) as first-line treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the providers from staff/group-model MCOs had greater access to and relied more on referral, the providers from network-model organizations were more likely to treat depression themselves. Given varying attitudes and behaviors, improving primary care for the treatment of depression will require unique strategies beyond enhancing technical knowledge for the two types of MCOs.
depression knowledge attitudes practice primary care managed care
Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderschied RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto U.S. mental and addictive disorder service system: epidemiologic catchment area prospective one-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kessler RC, McGonagel KA, Shanzang Z, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schreter RK. Ten trends in managed care and their impact on the biopsychosocial model. Hosp Commun Psychiatry. 1993;44:325–7.Google Scholar
Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Martin DP, Diehr P, Price KF, Richardson WC. Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges: a randomized trial. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:1628–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kleinman LC, Boyd EA, Heritage JC. Adherence to prescribed explicit criteria during utilization review: an analysis of communications between attending and reviewing physicians. JAMA. 1997;278:497–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr EA, Mittman ES, Hays RD, Siu AL, Leake B, Brook RH. Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization? Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:500–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Goold SD, Hofer T, Zimmerman M, Hayward RA. Measuring physician attitudes toward cost, uncertainty, malpractice, and utilization review. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;333:544–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons DW, Chawla AJ. Physician perceptions of the intrusiveness of utilization review. Stud Socioecon Environ Med. 1991;3–8.Google Scholar
Kerr EA, Mittman ES, Hays RD, Leake B, Brook RH. Quality assurance in capitated physician groups: where is the emphasis? JAMA. 1996;276:1236–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landon BE, Wilson IB, Cleary PD. A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care. JAMA. 1998;279:1377–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wholey DR, Burns LR. Organizational transitions: form changes by health maintenance organizations. Res Sociol Organi. 1993;1:257–93.Google Scholar
Wholey DR, Feldman R, Christianson JB, Engberg J. Scale and scope economies among health maintenance organizations. J Health Econ. 1996;15:657–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold MR, Hurley R, Lake T, Enso T, Berenson R. A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1678–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris JS. Why doctors do what they do: determinants of physician behavior. J Occup Med. 1990;32:1207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold M, Hurley R. The role of managed care “products” in managed care plans. Inquiry. 1997;34:29–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wells KB, Hosek SD, Marquis SM. Effects of preferred provider options on use of outpatient mental health services by three employee groups. Med Care. 1992;30:412–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felt-Lisk S. How HMOs structure primary care delivery. Managed Care Q. 1996;4:96–105.Google Scholar
Burns LR, Wholey DR. Differences in access and quality of care across HMO types. Health Serv Mgmt Res. 1991;4:32–45.Google Scholar
Shenkin BN. The independent practice association in theory and practice: lessons from experience. JAMA. 1995;273:1937–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenkin BN. Models of managed care: the potential power of the IPA. Managed Care Q. 1996;4:68–74.Google Scholar
Rogers WH, Wells KB, Meredith LS, Sturm R, Burnam MA. Outcomes for adult depressed outpatients under prepaid and fee-forservice financing. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:517–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Retchin SM, Brown B. The quality of ambulatory care in medicare health maintenance organizations. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:411–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depression Guideline Panel. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guidelines: Depression in Primary Care. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1993.Google Scholar
Ashworth CD, Williamson P, Montano D. A scale to measure physician beliefs about psychosocial aspects of patient care. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19:1235–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main DS, Lutz LL, Barrett JE, Matthew J, Miller RS. The role of primary care clinician attitudes, beliefs, and training in the diagnosis and treatment of depression: a report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network Inc. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:1061–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith LS, Wells KB, Kaplan S, Mazel RM. Counseling typically provided for depression: role of clinician specialty and payment system. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:905–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rost K, Humphrey J, Kelleher K. Physician management preferences and barriers to care for rural patients with depression. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:409–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, Calif: University of California; 1967;1:221–33.Google Scholar
Neuhous JM. Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses. In: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1992;1:249–73.Google Scholar
Shao W-A, Williams JW, Lee S, Badgett RG, Aaronson B, Cornell JE. Knowledge and attitudes about depression among non-generalists and generalists. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:161–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Meredith LS, Wells KB, Camp P. Clinician specialty and treatment style for depressed outpatients in primary care with and without medical comorbidities. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:1065–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veloski J, Barzansky B, Nash DB, Bastacky S, Stevens DP. Medical student education in managed care settings. JAMA. 1996;276:667–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg JM, Williams SV. Cost containment and changing physicians’ practice behavior: can the fox learn to guard the chicken coop? JAMA. 1981;246:2195–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar