Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 10, pp 670–674 | Cite as

Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American board of internal medicine evaluation scores

  • Victoria E. Rand
  • Esther S. Hudes
  • Warren S. Browner
  • Robert M. Wachter
  • Andrew L. Avins
Original Articles


OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of resident and attending physician gender on the evaluation of residents in an internal medicine training program.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: Large urban academic internal medicine residency program.

PARTICIPANTS: During their first 2 years of training, 132 residents (85 men, 47 women) received a total of 974 evaluations from 255 attending physicians (203 men, 52 women) from 1989 to 1995.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary measurements were the numerical portions of the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation form. Separate analyses were performed for each of the nine evaluation dimensions graded on a scale of 1 to 9. The primary outcome was the difference in the average scores received by each resident from male versus female attending physicians.

RESULTS: Compared with female trainees, male residents received significantly higher scores from male attending physicians than from female attending physicians in six of the nine dimensions: clinical judgment, history, procedures, relationships, medical care, and overall. Similar trends, not reaching conventional levels of statistical significance, were observed in the other three categories: medical knowledge, physical exam, and attitude. These differences ranged from 0.24 to 0.60 points, and were primarily due to higher grading of male residents by male attending physicians than by female attending physicians.

CONCLUSIONS: In one academic training program, we found a significant interaction in the grading process between the gender of internal medicine residents and the gender of their attending evaluators. This study raises the possibility that subtle aspects of gender bias may exist in medical training programs.

Key words

interprofessional relations social environment teaching internship residency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gordon GH, Labby D, Levinson W. Sex and the teacher-learner relationship in medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:443–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Komaromy M, Bindman AB, Haber RJ, Sande MA. Sexual harassment in medical training. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:322–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson WG, Lipkin M, Gilbert DA, Guzzo RA, Roberson L. Evaluating evaluation: assessment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:214–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haber RJ, Avins AL. Do ratings on the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form detect differences in clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:140–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1:43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Revised ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Day SC, Norcini JJ, Shea JA, Benson JA Jr. Gender differences in the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:309–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith CJ, Rodenhauser P, Markert RJ. Gender bias of Ohio physicians in the evaluation of the personal statements of residency applicants. Acad Med. 1991;66:479–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colliver JA, Vu NV, Marcy ML, Travis TA, Robbs RS. Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients’ ratings of examinees’ interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 1993;68:153–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solomon DJ, Speer AJ, Ainsworth MA, DiPette DJ. Investigating gender bias in preceptors’ ratings of medical students. Acad Med. 1993;68:703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayward CZ, Sachdeva A, Clarke JR. Is there gender bias in the evaluation of surgical residents? Surgery. 1987;102:297–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Enhancing the Environment for Women in Academic Medicine: Resources and Pathways. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria E. Rand
    • 1
  • Esther S. Hudes
    • 2
  • Warren S. Browner
    • 2
    • 4
  • Robert M. Wachter
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andrew L. Avins
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan Francisco
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaSan Francisco
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan Francisco
  4. 4.the General Internal Medicine SectionVeterans Affairs Medical CenterSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations