Intervention to increase mammography utilization in a public hospital
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of three approaches to increasing utilization of screening mammography in a public hospital setting in Northwest Louisiana.
DESIGN: Randomized intervention study.
POPULATION: Four hundred forty-five women aged 40 years and over, predominantly low-income and with low literacy skills, who had not had a mammogram in the preceding year.
INTERVENTION: All interventions were chosen to motivate women to get a mammogram. Group 1 received a personal recommendation from one of the investigators. Group 2 received the recommendation plus an easy-to-read National Cancer Institute (NCI) brochure. Group 3 received the recommendation, the brochure, and a 12-minute interactive educational and motivational program, including a soap-operastyle video, developed in collaboration with women from the target population.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mammography utilization was determined at 6 months and 2 years after intervention. A significant increase (p=.05) in mammography utilization was observed after the intervention designed in collaboration with patients (29%) as compared with recommendation alone (21%) or recommendation with brochure (18%) at 6 months. However, at 2 years the difference favoring the custom-made intervention was no longer significant.
CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months there was at least a 30% increase in the mammography utilization rate in the group receiving the intervention designed in collaboration with patients as compared with those receiving the recommendation alone or recommendation with brochure. Giving patients an easy-to-read NCI brochure and a personal recommendation was no more effective than giving them a recommendation alone, suggesting that simply providing women in a public hospital with a low-literacy-level, culturally appropriate brochure is not sufficient to increase screening mammography rates. In a multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of mammography use at 6 months was the custom-made intervention.
Key wordsmammography utilization public hospitals low income low literacy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:948–54.Google Scholar
- 2.Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA. Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease. Public Health Rep. 1994;84:62–7.Google Scholar
- 4.Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF, Lerman C, King E. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med. 1991;7:697–74.Google Scholar
- 12.Doak CC, Doak LG. Teaching Patients with Low-Literacy Skills, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1996.Google Scholar
- 13.National Work Group on Cancer and Literacy. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute, May 7, 1992.Google Scholar
- 16.Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, et al. Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:256–60.Google Scholar
- 17.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington DC: U.S. Printing Office; 1991:72, 114–5. DHHS publication (PHS) 91-50213.Google Scholar