Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 223–229 | Cite as

The relation between health status changes and patient satisfaction in older hospitalized medical patients

  • Kenneth E. Covinsky
  • Gary E. Rosenthal
  • Mary-Margaret Chren
  • Amy C. Justice
  • Richard H. Fortinsky
  • Robert M. Palmer
  • C. Seth Landefeld
Original Articles


OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between two patient outcome measures that can be used to assess the quality of hospital care: changes in health status between admission and discharge, and patient satisfaction.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PATIENTS: Subjects were 445 older medical patients (aged ≥70 years) hospitalized on the medical service of a teaching hospital.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We interviewed patients at admission and discharge to obtain two measures of health status: global health and independence in five activities of daily living (ADLs). At discharge, we also administered a 5-item patient satisfaction questionnaire. We assessed the relation between changes in health status and patient satisfaction in two sets of analyses, that controlled for either admission or discharge health status. When controlling for admission health status, changes in health status between admission and discharge were positively associated with patient satisfaction (p values ranging from .01 to .08). However, when controlling for discharge health status, changes in health status were no longer associated with patient satisfaction. For example, among patients independent in ADLs at discharge, mean satisfaction scores were similar regardless of whether patients were dependent at admission (i.e., had improved) or independent at admission (i.e., remained stable) (79.6 vs 81.2, p=.46). Among patients dependent in ADLs at discharge, mean satisfaction scores were similar regardless of whether they were dependent at admission (i.e., remained stable) or independent at admission (i.e., had worsened) (74.0 vs 75.7, p=.63). These findings were similar using the measure of global health and in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with similar discharge health status have similar satisfaction regardless of whether that discharge health status represents stable health, improvement, or a decline in health status. The previously described positive association between patient satisfaction and health status more likely represents a tendency of healthier patients to report greater satisfaction with health care, rather than a tendency of patients who improve following an interaction with the health system to report greater satisfaction. This suggests that changes in health status and patient satisfaction are measuring different domains of hospital outcomes and quality. Comprehensive efforts to measure the outcomes and quality of hospital care will need to consider both patient satisfaction and changes in health status during hospitalization.

Key words

quality of healthcare patient satisfaction health status outcome assessment hospitals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brook RH. Maintaining hospital quality: the need for international cooperation. JAMA. 1993;270:985–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lehr H, Strosberg M. Quality improvement in health care: is the patient still left out? Qual Rev Bull. 1991;17:326–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delbanco TL. Enriching the doctor-patient relationship by inviting the patient’s perspective. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:414–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J. Curing Health Care: New Strategies for Quality Improvement. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry. 1988;25:25–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosenthal GE, Harper DL. Cleveland Health Quality Choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994;20:425–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubin HR, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, McHorney CA, Ware JE. Patients’ ratings of outpatients visits in different practice settings: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1993;270:835–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donabedian A. Reflections on the effectiveness of quality assurance. In: Palmer HR, Donabedian A, Povar GJ, eds. Striving for Quality in Health Care: An Inquiry into Policy and Practice. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in healthcare. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:53–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patrick DL, Scrivens E, Charlton JRH. Disability and patient satisfaction with medical care. Med Care. 1983;21:1062–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall JA, Milburn MA, Epstein AM. A causal model of health status and satisfaction with medical care. Med Care. 1993;31:84–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aharony L, Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Med Care Rev. 1993;50:49–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rubin HR. Patients evaluation of their hospital care. A review of the literature. Med Care. 1989;28:S1–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts MJ, et al. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991;10:254–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landefeld CS, Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Fortinsky RH, Kowal J. A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1338–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner WP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic commorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ware EJ, Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:393–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carmel S. Satisfaction with hospitalization: a comparative analysis of three types of services. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:1243–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cleary PD, Keroy L, Karpanos G, McMullen W. Patient assessment of hospital care. Qual Rev Bull. 1983;15:172–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lochman JE. Factors related to patients’ satisfaction with their medical care. J Community Health. 1983;9:91–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abramowitz S, Cote AA, Berry E. Analyzing patient satisfaction: a multianalytic approach. Qual Rev Bull. 1987;13:122–30.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kravitz RL, Cope DW, Bhrany V, Leake B. Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:75–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ley P, Kinsey J, Atherton ST. Increasing patients’ satisfaction with communication. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1975;15:403–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth E. Covinsky
    • 1
  • Gary E. Rosenthal
    • 1
  • Mary-Margaret Chren
    • 1
    • 2
  • Amy C. Justice
    • 1
  • Richard H. Fortinsky
    • 1
  • Robert M. Palmer
    • 3
  • C. Seth Landefeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Care Research, Department of MedicineCase Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center
  2. 2.the Department of DermatologyCase Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center
  3. 3.the Department of Geriatric MedicineCleveland Clinic Foundation

Personalised recommendations