Enthusiasm for primary care
- 22 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare attitudes and perceptions of primary care among faculty, students, and residents oriented toward family medicine (FM) and general internal medicine (GIM).
DESIGN: Descriptive study using confidential telephone interviews.
PARTICIPANTS: National stratified probability sample of FM and GIM faculty (n=68), residents (n=196), and students (n=81).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We created indicators for attitudes toward primary care among the faculty that included perceptions of medical practice, experiences within the academic environment, and support for primary-care-oriented change. For the students and residents, we explored their perceptions of faculty and resident attitudes toward primary care, their perception of encouragement to enter primary care, and their satisfaction with training. Family medicine faculty showed more enthusiasm for primary care as manifested by their greater likelihood to endorse a primary care physician to manage a serious illness (FM 81.3% vs GIM 41.1%; p<.01), their strong encouragement of students to enter primary care (FM 86.2% vs GIM 36.3%; p<.01), and their greater support for primary-care-oriented changes in medical education (FM 56.8% vs GIM 14.7%; p<.01). Family medicine students and residents were more likely to perceive the primary care faculty as very satisfied with their work (FM 69.2% vs GIM 51.5%; p<.05), to feel strongly encouraged by peers toward primary care (FM 59.5% vs GIM 16.1%; p<.0001), and to have a primary care role model (FM 84.3% vs GIM 61.3%; p<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine faculty, students, and residents showed a consistent pattern of greater enthusiasm for primary care than their GIM counterparts. This may be a reflection of the different cultures of the two disciplines.
Key words
family medicine general internal medicine primary care attitudes perceptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Schatz IJ, Realini JP, Charney E. Family practice, internal medicine, and pediatrics as partners in the education of generalists. Acad Med. 1996;71:35–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Inui TS, Fihn SD, Wilkes R, eds, and the Generalist Project Steering Committee. Meeting the need: redressing the specialist generalist imbalance through education and training. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;4(suppl 1):S1–130.Google Scholar
- 3.Kimball HR, Young PR. Educational resource sharing and collaborative training in family practice and internal medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:320–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Geyman JP, Hart LG. Primary care at a crossroads: progress, problems, future projections. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994;7:60–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Colwill J. Where have all the primary care applicants gone? N Engl J Med. 1992;326:387–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Martini CJM, Veloski J, Barzansky B, Xu G, Fields SK. Medical school and student characteristics that influence choosing a generalist career. JAMA. 1996;272:661–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bland CJ, Meurer LN, Maldonado G. Determinants of primary care specialty choice: a non-statistical meta-analysis of the literature. Acad Med. 1995;70:620–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Carline JD, Greer T. Comparing physicians’ specialty interests upon entering medical school with their eventual practice specialties. Acad Med. 1991;66:44–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Whitcomb ME, Cullen TJ, Hart LG, Lishner DM, Rosenblatt RA. Comparing the characteristics of schools that produce high percentages and low percentages of primary care physicians. Acad Med. 1992;67:587–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kassler WM, Wartman SA, Silliman RA. Why medical students choose primary care careers. Acad Med. 1991;66:41–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kassebaum DG, Szenas PL. Factors influencing the specialty choices of 1993 medical school graduates. Acad Med. 1994;69:164–70.Google Scholar
- 12.Campos-Outcalt D, Senf JH. Medical school financial support, faculty composition, and selection of family practice by medical students. Fam Med. 1992;24:596–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kassebaum DG, Haynes RA. Relationship between third-year clerkships in family medicine and graduating students choices of family practice careers. Acad Med. 1992;67:217–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Schmittling G. Entry of medical school graduates into family practice residencies. Family Medicine. 1991;23:297–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ernay S, Allen D. Effect of a year long primary care clerkship on graduate selection of family practice residencies. Acad Med. 1991;66:234–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:53–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Block SD, Clark-Chiarelli N, Peters AS, Singer JD. A chilly climate for primary care. JAMA. 1996;276:677–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kalton G. Introduction to Survey Sampling. Beverly Hills, Calif; Sage Publications; 1983.Google Scholar
- 19.Graubard BI, Korn EL. Hypothesis testing with complex survey data: the use of classical quadratic test statistics with particular reference to regression problems. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(422):629–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Stephens GG. Family medicine as counterculture. Fam Med. 1989;21:103–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Saultz JW. Reflections on internal medicine and family medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:600–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar