Case-finding instruments for depression
- 1.4k Downloads
To determine the validity of a two-question case-finding instrument for depression as compared with six previously validated instruments.
The test characteristics of a two-question case-fidning instrument that asks about depressed mood and anhedonia were compared with six common case-finding instruments, using the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule as a criterion standard for the diagnosis of major depression.
Urgent care clinic at the San Francisco Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Five hundred thirty-six consecutive adult patients without mania or schizophrenia.
Measurements and main results
Measurements were two questions from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders patient questionnaire, both the long and short forms of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, both the long and short forms of the Beck Depression Inventory, the Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care, the Medical Outcomes Study depression measure, and the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule. The prevalence of depression, as determined by the standardized interview, was 18% (97 of 536). Overall, the case-finding instruments had sensitivities of 89% to 96% and specificities of 51% to 72% for diagnosing major depression. A positive response to the two-item instrument had a sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90–99%) and a specificity of 57% (95% CI 53–62%). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were similar for all of the instruments, with a range of 0.82 to 0.89.
The two-question case-finding instrument is a useful measure for detecting depression in primary care. It has similar test characteristics to other case-finding instruments and is less time-consuming.
Key Wordsdepression case-finding instruments
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care, Vol 1: Detection and Diagnosis. Clinical Practice Guideline. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1993. AHCPR 93-0550.Google Scholar
- 8.Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Talajic M. Depression following myocardial infarction. Impact on 6-month survival. Published erratum appears in JAMA. 1994;271:1082.Google Scholar
- 10.Shurman RA, Kramer PD, Mitchell JB. The hidden mental health network. Treatment of mental illness by nonpsychiatrist physicians. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:89–94.Google Scholar
- 12.Von Korff M, Shapiro S, Burke JD, et al. Anxiety and depression in a primary care clinic. Comparison of Diagnostic Interview Schedule, General Health Questionnaire, and practitioner assessments. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:152–6.Google Scholar
- 13.Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:53–63.Google Scholar
- 24.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association: 1994.Google Scholar
- 26.Andersen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77–84.Google Scholar
- 31.Stata Statistical Software: release 5.0. College Station, Tex.: Stata Corp: 1996.Google Scholar
- 32.Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science For Clinical Medicine. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown and Co.; 1991.Google Scholar
- 35.Walker RD, Howard MO, Lambert MD, Suchinsky R. Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of veterans with substance use disorders. Hosp Commun Psychiatry. 1994;45:232–7.Google Scholar
- 46.US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.Google Scholar
- 47.Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Ont.: Canada Communication Group: 1994.Google Scholar