Ecological Research

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 119–124 | Cite as

New method of monitoring remote wildlife via the Internet

Technical Report

A new system of monitoring remote wildlife via the Internet was developed. The system consists of a QuickTime streaming server with a digital PC camera and a recipient computer with monitoring software. Results of field experiments were fine. Wildlife (raccoon dogs and feral cats) inhabiting a forest remote from the observer were monitored and photographed automatically when detected. Data and frame rates were 35–300 kilobits per second and 3–14 frames per second, respectively, depending on the network traffic. This system is applicable wherever a broadband network is available and thus has great potential for ecological research.

Key words

camera trap CyberHunter Matagi Internet streaming Internet technology remote observation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Evological (2000) CoolStream User Guide. Evological, San Jose, CA. http://www.evological.com/Google Scholar
  2. Kaneko Y., Suzuki T., Maruyama N., Atoda O., Kanzaki N. & Tomisawa M. (1998) The ‘Trace Recorder’, a new device for surveying mammal home ranges, and its application to raccoon dog research. Mammal Study 17: 109– 118.Google Scholar
  3. Karanth K. U. (1995) Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture–recapture models. Biological Conservation 17: 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kitcher H. J. (1961) Wildlife flash photography. Malayan Nature Journal 17: 20–35.Google Scholar
  5. Leimgruber P., McShea W. J. & Rappole J. H. (1994) Predation on artificial nests in large forest blocks. Journal of Wildlife Management 17: 254–260.Google Scholar
  6. McCullough D. R., Pei K. C. J. & Wang Y. (2000) Home range, activity patterns, and habitat relations of Reeves’ muntjacs in Taiwan. Journal of Wildlife Management 17: 430–441.Google Scholar
  7. Miura S., Yasuda M. & Ratnam L. (1997) Who steals the fruits? Monitoring frugivory of mammals in a tropical rain forest. Malayan Nature Journal 17: 183–193.Google Scholar
  8. Otani T. (2001) Measuring fig foraging frequency of the Yakushima macaque by using automatic cameras. Ecological Research 17: 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. van Schaik C. P. & Griffiths M. (1996) Activity periods of Indonesian rain forest mammals. Biotropica 17: 105–112.Google Scholar
  10. Wemmer C., Kunz T. H., Lundie-Jenkins G. & McShea W. J. (1996) Mammalian sign. In: Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals (eds D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran & M. S. Foster) pp. 157–176. Smithsonian Institute Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Yasuda M., Miura S. & Nor Azman H. (2000) Evidence for food hoarding behavior in terrestrial rodents in Pasoh Forest Reserve, a Malaysian lowland rain forest. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 17: 164–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecological Society of Japan 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife Ecology LaboratoryTsukuba-NorinIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Tama Forest Science GardenForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukuba-NorinIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations