Abstract
Although cyclodextrins have been extensively utilized in various branches of supramolecular chemistry due to their numerous attractive attributes, however, to achieve even advanced applications, they often need structural modification through substitutions of suitable functional groups at their rims. A systematic investigation on how the degree of substitution on the cyclodextrin rims affects the binding affinity for a given guest molecule has however rarely been reported, especially from the perspective of photophysical studies. Herein, we report the non-covalent interaction of a styryl based dye, LDS-798, with three different sulfobutylether beta cyclodextrin (SBEnβCD) derivatives bearing varying degrees of substitution (n), using ground state absorption, steady-state emission, excited-state lifetime and time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurements. The dye–host binding constant values indicate that the strength of the interaction between LDS-798 and SBEnβCD derivatives follows an increasing trend with an increasing number of tethered sulfobutylether substituents on the cyclodextrin rims, which is attributed to the gradual increase of the electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged sulfobutylether groups and the positively charged LDS-798. Excited state lifetime measurements and ionic strength dependent studies on the dye–SBEnβCD complexes further support the increased affinity between the dye and the host in the supramolecular complexes, with an increasing number of sulfobutylether substituents on the βCD rims. The obtained results suggest that the molecular recognition of LDS-798 with SBEnβCD derivatives can be tuned very effectively by varying the number of sulfobutylether substituents on the cyclodextrin rims. Considering that SBE7βCD is one of the FDA approved agents for drug formulations, the obtained results with other SBEnβCD hosts may be useful in designing selective drug delivery applications, drug formulations, and effective fluorescence on–off switches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Monti and I. Manet, Supramolecular Photochemistry of Drugs in Biomolecular Environments, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 4051–4067.
J. M. Zayed, N. Nouvel, U. Rauwald and O. A. Scherman, Chemical Complexity—Supramolecular Self-Assembly of Synthetic and Biological Building Blocks in Water, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 2806–2816.
D. A. Uhlenheuer, K. Petkau and L. Brunsveld, Combining Supramolecular Chemistry with Biology, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 2817–2826.
P. J. Cragg, Supramolecular Chemistry: From Biological Inspiration to Biomedical Applications, Springer, NY, 2010.
B. Rybtchinski, Adaptive Supramolecular Nanomaterials Based on Strong Noncovalent Interactions, ACS Nano, 2011, 5(9), 6791–6818.
S. I. Stupp, V. LeBonheur, K. Walker, L. S. Li, K. E. Huggins, M. Keser and A. Amstutz, Supramolecular Materials: Self-Organized Nanostructures, Science, 1997, 276, 384–389.
M. Sayed and H. Pal, Supramolecularly Assisted Modulations in Chromophoric Properties And Their Possible Applications: An Overview, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 2685–2706.
M. J. Frampton and H. L. Anderson, Insulated Molecular Wires, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1028–1064.
D. B. Amabilino, D. K. Smith and J. W. Steed, Supramolecular Materials, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 2404–2420.
Y. Zhao, F. Sakai, L. Su, Y. Liu, K. Wei, G. Chen and M. Jiang, Progressive Macromolecular Self-Assembly: From Biomimetic Chemistry to Bio-Inspired Materials, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 5215–5256.
A. K. H. Hirsch, F. R. Fischer and F. Diederich, Phosphate Recognition in Structural Biology, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 338–352.
G. V. Oshovsky, D. N. Reinhoudt and W. Verboom, Supramolecular Chemistry in Water, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 2366–2393.
P. Ball, Water as an Active Constituent in Cell Biology, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 74–108.
H. Pal, Supramolecular Host-Guest Interactions: Modulations of Chromophoric Properties and Prospects, Sci. Adv. Today, 2016, 2, 25257.
H.-J. Schneider, Applications of supramolecular chemistry for 21st century technology, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2012.
S. Onogi, H. Shigemitsu, T. Yoshii, T. Tanida, M. Ikeda, R. Kubota and I. Hamachi, In Situ Real-Time Imaging of Self-sorted Supramolecular Nanofibres, Nat. Chem., 2016, 8, 743–752.
D. R. Boraste, G. Chakraborty, A. K. Ray, G. S. Shankarling and H. Pal, pH-Responsive Interaction of Fluorogenic Antimalarial Drug Quinine with Macrocyclic Host Cucurbit [7]uril: Modulations in Photophysical and Acid-Base Properties, ChemistrySelect, 2017, 2, 5128–5142.
D. R. Boraste, G. Chakraborty, A. K. Ray, G. S. Shankarling and H. Pal, Supramolecular Host-Guest Interaction of Antibiotic Drug Ciprofloxacin with Cucurbit[7]Uril Macrocycle: Modulations in Photophysical Properties and Enhanced Photostability, J. Photochem. Photobiol, A, 2018, 358, 26–37.
G. Chakraborty, A. K. Ray, P. K. Singh and H. Pal, A Highly Fluorescent Turn-on Probe in The Near-Infrared Region for Albumin Quantification in Serum Matrix, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 8383–8386.
W. Li, D. Chen, H. Wang, S. Luo, L. Dong, Y. Zhang, J. Shi, B. Tong and Y. Dong, Quantitation of Albumin in Serum Using “Turn-on” Fluorescent Probe with Aggregation-Enhanced Emission Characteristics, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 26094–26100.
A. M. Pettiwala and P. K. Singh, Supramolecular Dye Aggregate Assembly Enables Ratiometric Detection and Discrimination of Lysine and Arginine in Aqueous Solution, ACS Omega, 2017, 2, 8779–-8787.
J. Mohanty, H. Pal, A. K. Ray, S. Kumar and W. M. Nau, Supramolecular Dye Laser with Cucurbit[7]uril in Water, ChemPhysChem, 2007, 8, 54–56.
N. Barooah, J. Mohanty, H. Pal and A. C. Bhasikuttan, Stimulus-Responsive Supramolecular pKa Tuning of Cucurbit[7]uril Encapsulated Coumarin 6 Dye, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2012, 116, 3683–3689.
Y. Liu, B. H. Han and Y. T Chen, Molecular Recognition and Complexation Thermodynamics of Dye Guest Molecules by Modified Cyclodextrins and Calixarenesulfonates, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 4678–4687.
R. Ludwig and N. T K. Dzung, Calixarene-Based Molecules for Cation Recognition, Sensors, 2002, 2, 397–416.
N. Basilio, V. Francisco and L. Garcia-Rio, Aggregation of p-Sulfonatocalixarene-Based Amphiphiles and Supra-Amphiphiles, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2013, 14, 3140–3157.
J. Szejtli, Introduction and General Overview of Cyclodextrin Chemistry, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98(5), 1743–1754.
E. M. M. Del Valle, Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review, Process Biochem., 2004, 39, 1033–1046.
T. Loftsson and D. Duchene, Cyclodextrins and Their Pharmaceutical Applications, Int. J. Pharm., 2007, 329, 1–11.
A. Rasheed, A. C. K. Kumar and V. V. N. S. S. Sravanthi, Cyclodextrins as Drug Carrier Molecule: A Review, Sci. Pharm., 2008, 76, 567–598.
J. Zhang and P. X. Ma, Cyclodextrin-Based Supramolecular Systems For Drug Delivery: Recent Progress and Future Perspective, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2013, 65, 1215–1233.
W. Yang and M. M. de Villiers, Effect of 4-Sulphonato-Calix [n]Arenes and Cyclodextrins on the Solubilization of Niclosamide, a Poorly Water Soluble Anthelmintic, AAPS J., 2005, 7(1) (Article 23), E241–E248.
J. C. Harrison and M. R. Eftink, Cyclodextrin–Adamantanecarboxylate Inclusion Complexes: A Model System For The Hydrophobic Effect, Biopolymers, 1982, 21, 1153–1166.
Z. Yang and R. Breslow, Very Strong Binding of Lithocholic Acid to β-Cyclodextrin, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38(35), 6171–6172.
M. Roux, B. Perly and F. Djedaíni-Pilard, Self-assemblies of amphiphilic cyclodextrins, Eur. Biophys. J., 2007, 36(8), 861–867.
S. Bakkialakshmi and T. Menaka, Study on the inclusion Interactions of β-Cyclodextrin with Rhodamine B Base, Int. J. ChemTech Res., 2012, 4(1), 223–231.
M. N. Shinde, A. C. Bhasikuttan and J. Mohanty, The Contrasting Recognition Behavior of β-Cyclodextrin and Its Sulfobutylether Derivative towards 4′,6-Diamidino-2-pheny-lindole, ChemPhysChem, 2015, 16, 3425–3432.
G. Chakraborty, A. K. Ray, P. K. Singh and H. Pal, A Styryl Based Fluorogenic Probe with High Affinity for A Cyclodextrin Derivative, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2019, 17(28), 6895–6904.
N. H. Mudliar and P. K. Singh, Fluorescent H-Aggregates Hosted by a Charged Cyclodextrin Cavity, Chem. –Eur. J., 2016, 22, 7394–7398.
P. K. Singh, A. K. Mora, S. Murudkar and S. Nath, Dynamics under confinement: torsional dynamics of Auramine O in a nanocavity, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 34992–35002.
P. K. Singh, S. Murudkar, A. K. Mora and S. Nath, Ultrafast Torsional Dynamics of Thioflavin-T in an Anionic Cyclodextrin Cavity, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2015, 298, 40–48.
P. Sarkar, R. Luchowski, S. Raut, N. Sabnis, A. Remaley, A. G. Lacko, S. Thamake, Z. Gryczynski and I. Gryczynski, Studies on solvatochromic properties of aminophenylstyryl-quinolinum dye, LDS 798, and its application in studying submicron lipid based structure, Biophys. Chem., 2010, 153, 61–69.
H. Doan, M. Castillo, M. Bejjani, Z. Nurekeyev, S. V. Dzyuba, I. Gryczynski, Z. Gryczynski and S. Raut, Solvatochromic Dye LDS 798 as Microviscosity and pH Probe, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 29934–29939.
M. Gupta, D. K. Maity, S. K. Nayak and A. K. Ray, Modulation of Photophysics and Photostability of Cationic Coumarin 1 Dye Upon Inclusion with Macrocyclic Host Cucurbit[7]Uril, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2015, 300, 15–21.
M. Sayed, M. Sundararajan, J. Mohanty, A. C. Bhasikuttan and H. Pal, Photophysical and Quantum Chemical Studies on the Interactions of Oxazine-1 Dye with Cucurbituril Macrocycles, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2015, 119, 3046–3057.
S. S. Thakare, G. Chakraborty, P. Krishnakumar, A. K. Ray, D. K. Maity, H. Pal and N. Sekar, Supramolecularly Assisted Modulation of Optical Properties of BODIPY-Benzimidazole Conjugates, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2016, 120, 11266–11278.
G. Chakraborty, A. K. Ray and H. Pal, Interaction of a Triaryl Methane Dye with Cucurbit[7]uril and Bovine Serum Albumin: A Perspective of Cooperative versus Competitive Bindings, ChemistrySelect, 2018, 3, 1088–1096.
P. Thordarson, Determining Association Constants from Titration Experiments in Supramolecular Chemistry, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1305–1323.
J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Plenumm Press, Springer, New York, 3rd edn, 2006.
R. Sola-Llano, V. Martínez-Martínez, Y. Fujita, L. Gómez-Hortigüela;, A. Alfayate, H. Uji-i, E. Fron, J. Pérez-Pariente and I. López-Arbeloa, Formation of a Nonlinear Optical Host–Guest Hybrid Material by Tight Confinement of LDS 722 into Aluminophosphate 1D Nanochannels, Chem. –Eur. J., 2016, 22, 15700–15711.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d0pp00103a
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborty, G., Ray, A.K., Singh, P.K. et al. Does the degree of substitution on the cyclodextrin hosts impact their affinity towards guest binding?. Photochem Photobiol Sci 19, 956–965 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0pp00103a
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d0pp00103a