The popularity of nail beauty has increased during the last few years in Spain, as well as in other countries. Nowadays there are a large number of nail dryer devices in the market with ultraviolet (UV) fluorescent lamps, light emitting diodes (LED) or a combination of both. The different spectral emissions of each individual nail dryer device require particular nail polishes, which are polymerized by specific wavelengths and a controlled exposure time to achieve the desired results. We have measured and analyzed the emission of 28 nail dryer devices currently in use in Spanish beauty centers. The emission of each individual nail dryer device showed a particular spectral distribution and maximum intensity, especially those with fluorescent lamps or LED/UV combinations. About 30% of the devices emitted more UV-A radiation than that received in Barcelona at solar noon in summer. Nevertheless, in all cases the erythemal irradiance was low, similarly to ambient values at solar noon in winter or when the solar altitude is low. The erythemal doses corresponding to a typical session were, therefore, lower than those received from sunlight at summer midday at equivalent exposure times. The biological irradiances for photoaging (skin sagging and elastosis) showed high variability depending on the device, especially for fluorescent lamps. Since the emission of LED-based devices is centered in the visible region, erythemal and photoaging irradiances were low. An analysis of the labelling showed that 85% of the devices had a visible label, although 23% contained some errors, according to the EN 60335-1 guideline.
L. T. N. Nilsen, M. Hannevik and M. B. Veierod, Ultraviolet exposure from indoor tanning devices: a systematic review, Br. J. Dermatol., 2016, 174, 730–740, DOI: 10.1111/ bjd.14388.
Y. Sola, D. Baeza, M. Gómez and J. Lorente, Ultraviolet spectral distribution and erythema-weighted irradiance from indoor tanning devices compared with solar radiation exposures, J. Photochem. Photobiol., 2016, 161, 450–455, DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.06.014.
M. Boniol, P. Autier, P. Boyle and S. Gandini, Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis, Br. Med. J., 2012, 345, e4757, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e4757.
CENELEC, European Standard EN 60335-2-27:2010, Household and similar electrical appliances - Safety - Part 2-27: Particular requirements for appliances for skin exposure to ultraviolet and infrared radiation, 2011.
RD 1002/2002, Spanish Royal order that regulates the sale and use of sunbeds, BOE Official Publication 243, 2002 (September 27, 2002).
F. Pagano, A review of gel nail technologies, Cosmet. Toiletries, 2015, 130, 40.
D. F. MacFarlane and C. A. Alonso, Occurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers on the hands after UV nail light exposure, Arch. Dermatol., 2009, 145, 447–449.
A. Markova and M. Weinstock, Risk of skin cancer associated with the use of UV nail lamp, J. Invest. Dermatol., 2012, 133, 1097–1099.
J. C. Dowdy and R. M. Sayre, Photobiological safety evaluation of UV nail lamps, Photochem. Photobiol., 2013, 89, 961–967.
IESNA Photobiology Committee, ASNI/IESNA RP-27.3-07, Recommended Practice for Photobiological Safety for Lamps and Lamps Systems - Risk Group Classification and Labeling. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York, 2007.
B. L. Diffey, The risk of squamous cell carcinoma in women from exposure to UVA lamps used in cosmetic nail treatment, Br. J. Dermatol., 2012, 167, 1175–1178.
L. R. Shipp, C. A. Warner, F. A. Rueggeberg and L. S. Davis, Further investigation into the risk of skin cancer associated with the use of UV nail lamps, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2014, 150, 775–776.
J. Curtis, P. Tanner, C. Judd, B. Childs, C. Hull and S. Leachman, Acrylic nail curing UV lamps: high-intensity exposure warrants further research of skin cancer risk, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2013, 69, 1069–1070.
Y. Yagci, S. Jockusch and N. J. Turro, Photoinitiated polymerization: Advances, challenges and opportunities, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 6245–6260.
H. Moseley, UV measurements related to artificial tanning units, Working Group 4 of the Thematic Network for Ultraviolet Measurements, 2000, UVNews, 6 (Download at http://metrology.tkk.fi/uvnet/source/partC.pdf).
CIE, Erythema reference action spectrum and standard erythema dose, Commision Internationale de l'Éclairage, CIE S007E, 1998, CIE Central Bureau, Vienna, Austria.
D. Bisset, D. P. Hannon and T. Orr, Wavelength dependence of histological, physical and visible changes in chronically UV-irradiated hairless mouse skin, Photochem. Photobiol., 1989, 50, 763–769.
L. H. Kligman and R. M. Sayre, An action spectrum for ultraviolet induced elastosis in hairless mice: quantification of elastosis by image analysis, Photochem. Photobiol., 1991, 53, 237–242.
Y. Sola and J. Lorente, Contribution of UVA irradiance to the erythema and photoaging effects in solar and sunbed exposures, J. Photochem. Photobiol., 2014, 143, 5–11.
World Health Organization, Solar UV Index, a practical guide, ISBN 92 4 159007 6, Geneva, Switzerland.
D. Schoon, P. Bryson and J. McConnell, Do UV nail lamps emit unsafe levels of ultraviolet light?, http://www.schoon-scientific.com/downloads/UV-Nail-Lamps-Facts.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2017.
P. M. Girard, S. Francesconi, M. Pozzebon, D. Graindorge, P. Rochette, R. Drouin and E. Sage, UVA-induced damage to DNA and proteins: direct versus indirect photochemical processes, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2011, 261, 012002.
E. Sage, P. M. Girard and S. Francesconi, Unravelling UVA-induced mutagenesis, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2012, 11, 74–80.
The authors are grateful for the collaboration of all facilities allowing the measurement of nail lamp devices.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baeza, D., Sola, Y., del Río, L.A. et al. Nail dryer devices: a measured spectral irradiance and labelling review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 17, 592–598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7pp00388a