Abstract
SF6 and SF6-N2 mixed gases are used widely as insulators, but such gases have high greenhouse gas potential. The separation of SF6 from SF6-N2 mixed gases is an inevitable result of their use. Single-walled carbon nanohorns (CNHs) were used here for a fundamental study of the separation of SF6 and N2. The diameters of the interstitial and internal nanopores of the CNHs were 0.7 and 2.9 nm, respectively. The high selectivity of SF6 over N2 was observed only in the low-pressure regime in the interstitial 0.7 nm nanopores; the selectively was significantly decreased at higher pressures. In contrast, the high selectivity was maintained over the entire pressure range in the internal 2.9-nm nanopores. These results showed that the wide carbon nanopores were efficient for the separation of SF6 from the mixed gas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
SF6 is used as an insulator for high voltage breakers and circuit breakers in electrical equipment, because of its low-dielectric properties, low toxicity and high stability1,2,3. Despite these advantages, SF6 has a global warming potential that is 24000 times larger than that of CO2. The restriction of SF6 emissions is therefore necessary to allow the use of SF6 in applications in a variety of fields4,5,6. The mixing of SF6 with N2 can reduce SF6 emissions and can save costs in industrial applications. SF6-N2 mixed gases retain insulating properties, even with low SF6 contents (SF6:N2 = 1:9)7,8. Mixed SF6-N2 gases have therefore been widely applied and the purification and recovery of SF6 have become more important. The separation of gases is typically achieved using liquefaction, adsorption, or membrane separation techniques. In liquefaction techniques using refrigeration, it is possible to separate a target molecule by choosing an appropriate temperature near the boiling temperature. However, the separation of SF6 via liquefaction is costly, because the system must be maintained at 209 K (the boiling temperature of SF6). Liquefaction techniques that use pressurization also have high energy costs; the liquefaction of pure and mixed SF6 gases (SF6:N2 = 1:9) at 293 K was observed above 2 and 20 MPa, respectively8,9. The hydration of SF6 and N2 was also conducted under high pressures10. Motivated by these high costs, adsorption8,11,12,13,14,15 and membrane separation9,16,17,18 have been proposed as low-energy-cost techniques and the adsorption technique shows promise for applications in a variety of fields.
SF6 was preferentially adsorbed over N2 in porous media, because of its strong adsorption potential; in contrast, SF6 was rarely adsorbed in extremely narrow nanopores8,11,12,13,14,15. SF6 adsorption was rarely observed in zeolites with pores with a diameter of 0.5 nm, but N2 was adsorbed easily in such narrow nanopores8; in contrast, zeolites with pores with a diameter of 1.0 nm selectively adsorbed SF6 molecules over N2 molecules11. Metal organic frameworks, which have uniform and narrow nanopores, also show highly selective adsorption12,13. The pore size dependence of the SF6-and-N2 separation abilities of mesoporous silica and zeolite-templated carbons was evaluated by Builes et al., using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations14; 1.1 nm-nanopores separated SF6 and N2 well. Those preceding studies demonstrated the SF6 separation efficiency of various porous media having narrow pores, whereas in pores larger than 2.0 nm, the SF6 and N2 separation has been neglected. The mechanisms responsible for the adsorption and separation of SF6 also have not yet been sufficiently clarified. Thus, narrow and wide pores have been simply considered as having the high separation ability in small pore volumes and low separation ability in large pore volumes, respectively. Porous media having the high separation ability and large pore volumes are ideal materials for application of the separation. We here propose to use wide nanopores for the purpose, because of having relatively high adsorption potentials. In this paper, nanopores are defined as narrower pores than 5 nm.
Nanoporous carbons are composed only of carbon and have simple geometries and they are therefore useful for examining the above-mentioned adsorption and separation mechanisms. Single walled carbon nanohorns (CNHs) have a tubular structure similar to that of carbon nanotubes19,20,21,22. The internal and interstitial sites of CNH particles have cylindrical nanopores with diameters of 2.9 and 0.7 nm, respectively and the adsorption in the two sets of nanopores can be evaluated separately21,22. Single-walled carbons also have the potential to adsorb large amounts of SF6. Thus, CNHs have the advantages of being a highly efficient separation medium and allowing the evaluation of the mechanisms responsible for the adsorption and separation of SF6. Here, the selective adsorption of SF6 over N2 in the internal and interstitial nanopores of CNHs was evaluated by measuring the adsorption of SF6 and N2 at 273 K. The mechanisms responsible for the adsorption and separation of SF6 and N2 were also investigated in this study.
Results and Discussion
Both the internal and interstitial nanopores of the partially oxidized CNHs were available for the adsorption of molecules, whereas the internal nanopores of the as-grown CNHs were closed to adsorbed molecules; thus, molecules could be adsorbed in the interstitial nanopores, as reported elsewhere23,24. The internal nanopores were assessed by measuring the difference between the amounts of N2 adsorbed for the partially oxidized CNHs and the as-grown CNHs. The micropore volumes of the interstitial and internal nanopores of the CNHs were determined from the N2 adsorption isotherms measured at 77 K on the as-grown and partially oxidized CNHs, as shown in Fig. 1a. The nanopore volumes of the as-grown and partially oxidized CNHs were 0.13 and 0.56 mL g−1, respectively, as obtained from the Dubinin-Radushkevich equation25. Thus, the nanopore volumes of the interstitial and internal nanopores of the CNHs were 0.13 and 0.43 mL g−1, respectively. The adsorption isotherms and porosities of the CNHs agreed with results from previous studies20,21,22,23,24,26. The nanopore size distributions in Fig. 1b were obtained using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda theory27. The interstitial and internal nanopore sizes of the CNHs were distributed mainly in the ranges of <1.2 nm and 1–4 nm, respectively. Thus, the interstitial and internal nanopores were named as narrow and wide nanopores, respectively. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies in Fig. 1c and transmission electron microscopic images in Fig. 1d indicated that geometrical and chemical structures were rarely changed by the partial oxidation of as-grown CNHs. The O/C ratios were approximately 5% and those CNHs had less surface oxygen groups. Thus, we discussed the change of selectivity by nanopore size. Figure 1e,f shows N2 and SF6 adsorption isotherms measured for the CNHs at 273 K. The N2 adsorption isotherms measured at 273 K were Henry-type and the adsorbed amounts were small. In contrast, SF6 was adsorbed well in these nanopores even at 1 atm, because of the strong intermolecular interactions of the SF6, corresponding to P/P0 = 0.07. Because the amounts of SF6 adsorbed in the interstitial and internal nanopores were significantly different, the SF6 was less densely packed in the interstitial, narrow nanopores with a diameter of 0.7 nm.
The adsorption density results for SF6 and N2 in the interstitial and internal nanopores (shown in Fig. 2a) clearly showed that the SF6 adsorption density was significantly higher in the internal nanopores than in the interstitial nanopores, whereas the N2 adsorption density in the interstitial nanopores was higher than in the internal nanopores, as reported elsewhere28. Here, the adsorption densities were obtained from the number of adsorbed molecules and the micropore volume. The slightly higher density of N2 in the interstitial nanopores was a result of the stronger adsorption potential in the interstitial nanopores, compared with that in the internal nanopores. The significantly lower density of SF6 in the interstitial nanopores was a result of the size restriction imposed by the narrow nanopores, which had a diameter of 0.7 nm. Thus, the adsorption density was controlled by two factors: the adsorption potential and the steric restriction. These factors led to the highly selective adsorption of SF6 and N2. The selectivity for SF6 over N2 was defined by a theoretical ideal adsorption expression, as follows29:
Here, xi and yi are the molar fractions of molecule i in the adsorbed and bulk phases, respectively. This theoretical ideal adsorption expression has been adopted previously to evaluate the selectivity of binary mixture gas adsorption at relatively low pressures in various porous media12,30,31,32,33,34. The selectivity for the adsorption of SF6 over N2 in the interstitial and internal nanopores of the CNHs (shown in Fig. 2b,c) was determined from the adsorption densities shown in Fig. 2a. The selectivity is a measure of the molecular sieving ability8,35,36,37. The selectivity in the interstitial nanopores decreased exponentially from 60 to 10 at ySF6:yN2 = 0.1:0.9, which is a preferable molar fraction for industrial applications7,8. For the interstitial nanopores, the selectivity was consistently the greatest at ySF6:yN2 = 0.1:0.9, for all of the molar fractions analyzed in this study. In the internal nanopores, the selectivity was also consistently the greatest at ySF6:yN2 = 0.1:0.9; however, the decreases in the selectivity with increasing pressure were more moderate than those observed in the interstitial nanopores. The exponential decrease of the selectivity observed in the interstitial nanopores was a result of the restriction of the high-density SF6 adsorption by the narrow nanopores. At very low pressures, the strong intermolecular potential of SF6 promoted the adsorption of SF6 in the nanopores, but N2 was rarely adsorbed. In the internal nanopores with a diameter of 2.9 nm (i.e., in wide nanopores), SF6 was adsorbed without any imposition of a size restriction by the nanopores. Thus, the strong adsorption potential of SF6 resulted in high selectivity over the entire range of pressures. High selectivity was therefore achieved via the negative contribution of the steric restriction produced by the narrow interstitial nanopores alone and the positive contribution of the strong adsorption potential of SF6 in both the narrow interstitial and wide internal nanopores. At ySF6:yN2 = 0.1:0.9, the selectivity was 44 in the internal nanopores at 1 atm, which was equivalent to the greatest selectivity value determined in previous studies, as shown in Table 111,12,13. Thus, the results of this study indicated that the wide nanopores with large pore volumes provided the greatest selectivity—yielding values similar to the greatest values achieved previously in extremely narrow nanopores, under ambient conditions—although grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations suggested that wide nanopores rarely show separation abilities at high pressures14.
In this study, the SF6 and N2 separation abilities of nanoporous carbons were evaluated using adsorption isotherms measured for the narrow interstitial and wide internal nanopores of CNHs (considered as narrow and wide nanopores, respectively). The narrow nanopores of the CNHs had an average diameter of 0.7 nm and showed high SF6 separation abilities in the low-pressure regime; however, the selectivity decreased rapidly with increasing pressure. In contrast, the selectivity in the wide nanopores, which had an average diameter of 2.9 nm, was maintained over the entire range of pressures. These results showed that the wide nanopores functioned well as sites for the separation of SF6.
Methods
CNHs were prepared by the Iijima and Yudasaka groups19. The internal nanopores were made accessible using partial oxidation, which was performed at 673 K for 1 h, in an atmosphere of flowing O2 gas (using a flow rate of 100 mL min−1). N2 adsorption isotherms were measured at 77 K and 273 K and SF6 adsorption isotherms were measured at 273 K; in both cases the adsorption isotherms were measured for CNHs and open-CNHs using a volumetric apparatus (Autosorb-1, Quantachrome Co., Florida, USA), after heating at 423 K for more than 2 h, at pressures below 10 mPa. Dubinin-Radushkevich analysis was conducted for the above adsorption isotherms, to evaluate the micropore volumes. The micropore volumes were evaluated using a Dubinin-Radushkevich analysis range of [ln (P/P0)]2 = 20–60, which is typically applied for the analysis of micropores. X-ray photoelectron microscopy (Mg Kα radiation at 10 kV and 10 mA; JPS-9010MX, JEOL Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used to assess the surface oxygen groups in CNHs. Transmission electron microscopy at 120 keV (JEM-2100F, JEOL Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used for direct observations of CNHs.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Takase, A. et al. Wide Carbon Nanopores as Efficient Sites for the Separation of SF6 from N2. Sci. Rep. 5, 11994; doi: 10.1038/srep11994 (2015).
References
Maiss, M. & Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M. Atomspheric SF6: Trends, Sources and Prospects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 3077–3086 (1998).
Chiang, Y. C. & Wu, P.-Y. Adsorption equilibrium of sulfur hexafluoride on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Hazard. Mater. 178, 729–738 (2010).
Fang, X. K. et al. Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Emission Estimates for China: An Inventory for 1990–2010 and a Projection to 2020. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3848–3855 (2013).
Ravishankara, A. R., Solomon, S., Turnipseed, A. A. & Warren, R. F. Atmospheric Lifetimes of Long-Lived Halogenated Species. Science 259, 194–199 (1993).
Mohindra, V., Chase, H., Sawin, H. H. & Mocella, M. T. Abatement of perfluorocom-pounds (PFCs) in a microwave tubular reactor using O2 as an additive gas. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 10, 399–411 (1997).
Langan, J., Maroulis, P. & Ridgeway, R. Strategies for greenhouse gas reduction. Solid State Technol. 39, 115–121 (1996).
Inami, K. et al. Problems of the Application of N2/SF6 Mixtures to Gas-Insulated Bus. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 137, 25–31 (2001).
Toyoda, M. et al. SF6 Reclaimer From SF6/N2 Mixtures by Gas Separation With Molecular Sieving Effect. IEEE Trans. Power. Deliv. 18, 442–448 (2003).
Yamamoto, O., Takuma, T. & Kinouchi, M. Recovery of SF6 from N2/SF6 gas mixtures by using a polymer membrane. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 18, 32–37 (2002).
Cha, I., Lee, S., Lee, J. D., Lee, G.-W. & Seo, Y. Separation of SF6 from Gas Mixtures using Gas Hydrate Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 6117–6122 (2010).
Murase, H., Imai, T., Inohara, T. & Toyoda, M. Use of Zeolite Filter in Portable Equipment for Recovering SF6 in SF6/N2 Mixtures. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 11, 166–173 (2004).
Kim, M. B., Lee, S. J., Lee, C. Y. & Bae, Y. S. High SF6 selectivities and capacities in isostructural metal-organic frameworks with proper pore sizes and highly dense unsaturated metal sites. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 190, 356–361 (2014).
Kim, P.–J. et al. Separation of SF6 from SF6/N2 mixture using metal-organic framework MIL-100(Fe) granule. Chem. Eng. J. 262, 683–690 (2015).
Builes, S., Roussel, T. & Vega, L. F. Optimization of the Separation of Sulfur Hexafluoride and Nitrogen by Selective Adsorption Using Monte Carlo Simulations. AIChE J. 57, 962–974 (2011).
Cho, W. S., Lee, K. H., Chang, H. J., Huh, W. & Kwon, H. H. Evaluation of pressure-temperature swing adsorption for sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) recovery from SF6 and N2 gas mixture. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 28, 2196–2201 (2011).
Shiojiri, K., Yanagisawa, Y., Yamasaki, A. & Kiyono, F. Separation of F-gases (HFC-134a and SF6) from gaseous mixtures with nitrogen by surface diffusion through a porous Vycor glass membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 282, 442–449 (2006).
Shao, L., Low, B. T., Chung, T. S. & Greenberg, A. R. Polymeric membranes for the hydrogen economy: Contemporary approaches and prospects for the future. J. Membr. Sci. 327, 18–31 (2009).
Kim, D. H., Ko, Y. H., Kim, T. H., Park, J. S. & Lee, H.-K. Separation of N2/SF6 binary mixtures using polyethersulfone (PESf) hollow fiber membrane. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 1081–1085 (2012).
Iijima, S. et al. Nano-aggregates of single-walled graphitic carbon nano-horns. Chem. Phys. Lett. 309, 165–170 (1999).
Murata, K. et al. Pore structure of single-wall carbon nanohorn aggregates. Chem. Phys. Lett. 331, 14–20 (2000).
Ohba, T. et al. N2 Adsorption in an Internal Nanopore Space of Single-Walled Carbon Nanohorn: GCMC Simulation and Experiment. Nano Lett. 1, 371–373 (2001).
Ohba, T. et al. Quasi One-Dimensional Nanopores in Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorn Colloids Using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulation Aided Adsorption Technique. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 8659–8662 (2005).
Murata, K. et al. Nanowindow-Induced Molecular Sieving Effect in a Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorn. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 12668–12669 (2002).
Utsumi, S. et al. Opening Mechanism of Internal Nanoporosity of Single-Wall Carbon Nanohorn. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 14319–14324 (2005).
Dubinin, M. M. The Potential Theory of Adsorption of Gases and Vapors for Adsorbents with Energetically Nonuniform Surfaces. Chem. Rev. 60, 235–241 (1960).
Ohba, T., Yamamoto, S., Takase, A., Yudasaka, M., & Iijima, S. Evaluation of carbon nanopores using large molecular probes in grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations and experiments. Carbon 88, 133–138 (2015).
Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G. & Halenda, P. P. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 3155–3158 (1951).
Ohba, T. The thinnest molecular separation sheet by graphene gates of single-walled carbon nanohorns. ACS Nano 8, 11313–11319 (2014).
Myers, A. L. & Prausnitz, J. M. Thermodynamics of Mixed-Gas Adsorption. AIChE J. 11, 121–127 (1964).
Cannon, J. J., Vlugt, T. J. H., Dubbeldam, D., Maruyama, S. & Shiomi, J. Simulation Study on the Adsorption Properties of Linear Alkanes on Closed Nanotube Bundles. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 9812–9819 (2012).
Jakobtorweihen, S. & Keil, F. J. Adsorption of alkanes, alkenes and their mixtures in single-walled carbon nanotubes and bundles. Mol. Simulat. 35, 90–99 (2009).
Furmaniak, S. et al. Surface to volume ratio of carbon nanohorn – A crucial factor in CO2/CH4 mixture separation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 595, 67–72 (2014).
Bae, Y. S., Farfa, O. K., Hupp, J. T. & Snurr, R. Q. Enhancement of CO2/N2 selectivity in a metal-organic framework by cavity modification. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 2131–2134 (2009).
Babarao, R., Hu, Q. Z., Jiang, J. W., Chempath, S. & Sandler, I. S. Diffusion and Separatoin of CO2 and CH4 in Silicalite, C168 Schwarzite and IRMOF-1: A Comparative Study from Molecular Simulation. Langmuir 24, 5474–5484 (2008).
Ohba, T., Kanoh, H. & Kaneko, K. Superuniform Molecular Nanogate Fabrication on Graphene Sheets of Single Wall Carbon Nanohorns for Selective Molecular Separation of CO2 and CH4 . Chem. Lett. 40, 1089–1091 (2011).
Lopez-Ramon, M. V., Jagiello, J., Bandosz, T. J. & Seaton, N. A. Determination of the Pore Size Distribution and Network Connectivity in Microporous Solids by Adsorption Measurements and Monte Carlo Simulation. Langmuir 13, 4435–4445 (1997).
Cao, D. V. & Sircar, S. Heat of Adsorption of Pure Sulfur Hexafluoride on Micro-Mesoporous Adsorbents. Adsorption 7, 73–80 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. M. Yudasaka from the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan, Prof. S. Iijima from Meijo University, Japan for supplying the NHs. The transmission electron microscope observations were conducted at the Center for Analytical Instrumentation, Chiba University. This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number 26706001 and 15K12261, Research Fellowships from the Futaba Electronics Memorial Foundation and Japan Gas Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.T. and T.O. planned the study. A.T. conducted the measurements. H.K supported the experiments. T.O. wrote the main manuscript. All authors have approved the final manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Takase, A., Kanoh, H. & Ohba, T. Wide Carbon Nanopores as Efficient Sites for the Separation of SF6 from N2. Sci Rep 5, 11994 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11994
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11994
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Carbon Nanohorns as Reaction Nanochambers – a Systematic Monte Carlo Study
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Porous Cellulose Acetate by Specific Solvents with Water Pressure Treatment for Applications to Separator and Membranes
Macromolecular Research (2018)
-
Limited Quantum Helium Transportation through Nano-channels by Quantum Fluctuation
Scientific Reports (2016)