Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Human Hypertension Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) readings in the doctor’s office are frequently higher than home or ambulatory values. This study examines the role of the physician in the aetiology of the ‘white coat’ effect, by comparing standard readings taken by the family physician of 27 treated hypertensive patients with readings taken by an automated BP recording device, with the patient alone in the examining room during the same office visit. The physician and automated readings were each compared to the mean awake ambulatory BP. Mean (± s.e.m.) routine office BP (mm Hg) recorded by the patient’s physician (155 ± 4/80 ± 2) was similar to the mean value obtained using the automated BP recording device (157 ± 3/83 ± 2). The mean awake ambulatory BP was 145 ± 3/78 ± 2 with the systolic value lower (P < 0.05) than either the physician or automated reading. self-measurement of bp by the patient in the office setting does not reduce the magnitude of the white coat effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, M., Meglis, G. & Polemidiotis, G. The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 11, 491–493 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000483

  • Springer Nature Limited

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation