Skip to main content
Log in

Disparity of serum transferrin receptor measurements among different assay methods

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To highlight differences in the quantification of transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration (a reliable index of iron deficiency) between three different assay methods.

Design: Methods comparison of TfR measurements in ‘elevated’ and ‘normal’ human sera using the Ramco, Quantikine and ‘Lab’ assays.

Setting: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Subjects: Pooled TfR for elevated and normal human sera obtained from the Ramco TfR assay kit.

Main outcome measures: Differences between TfR concentrations in normal and elevated samples and repeatability for each assay method and limits of agreement in TfR quantification between assay methods.

Results: The mean TfR concentrations for the elevated reference serum samples was higher than the normal reference samples within each individual assay (P<0.001); however, measurement agreement between methods was poor.

Conclusions: Recognition of the relative differences in the values obtained from each of the assays should affect the interpretation of TfR concentration as an index of iron deficiency.

Sponsorship: This research was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Ontario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeung, G., Kjarsgaard, J. & Zlotkin, S. Disparity of serum transferrin receptor measurements among different assay methods. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 801–804 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600650

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600650

  • Springer Nature Limited

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation