Abstract
Objective: To highlight differences in the quantification of transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration (a reliable index of iron deficiency) between three different assay methods.
Design: Methods comparison of TfR measurements in ‘elevated’ and ‘normal’ human sera using the Ramco, Quantikine and ‘Lab’ assays.
Setting: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Subjects: Pooled TfR for elevated and normal human sera obtained from the Ramco TfR assay kit.
Main outcome measures: Differences between TfR concentrations in normal and elevated samples and repeatability for each assay method and limits of agreement in TfR quantification between assay methods.
Results: The mean TfR concentrations for the elevated reference serum samples was higher than the normal reference samples within each individual assay (P<0.001); however, measurement agreement between methods was poor.
Conclusions: Recognition of the relative differences in the values obtained from each of the assays should affect the interpretation of TfR concentration as an index of iron deficiency.
Sponsorship: This research was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Ontario.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeung, G., Kjarsgaard, J. & Zlotkin, S. Disparity of serum transferrin receptor measurements among different assay methods. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 801–804 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600650
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600650
- Springer Nature Limited
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Reducing Iron Deficiency in 18–36-months-old US Children: Is the Solution Less Calcium?
Maternal and Child Health Journal (2016)
-
Procedures for monitoring recombinant erythropoietin and analogues in doping control
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2007)