Skip to main content
Log in

Conditioning Regimens

High-dose treosulfan in patients with relapsed or refractory high-grade lymphoma receiving tandem autologous blood stem cell transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bone Marrow Transplantation Submit manuscript

Summary:

This phase I/II study evaluated high-dose treosulfan in patients with high-grade lymphoma. In all, 21 patients (median age 51, 25–60 years) with primary refractory disease (n=3) or early (n=11) or late (n=7) relapse received DexaBEAM and one course etoposide for cytoreduction and PBPC mobilization. Subsequently, 16 patients received 30 g/m2 treosulfan and 140 mg/m2 melphalan, followed by autologous transplantation. Nine patients received a 2nd high-dose treatment (HDT) with 30 g/m2 treosulfan and 750 mg/m2 thiotepa. Recovery time to >1/nl leukocytes and >25/nl thrombocytes was 8.9 (range 8–11) and 11.9 (8–16) days after 1st and 9.6 (7–13) and 13 (9–19) days after 2nd HDT. Reversible grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities included mucositis (n=7), infection (n=7) and one episode of re-entry tachycardia. Two treatment-related deaths occurred after 2nd HDT. Since three dose-limiting toxicities occurred among nine patients receiving tandem HDT, 30 g/m2 of treosulfan was considered MTD in this setting. Patients with late compared to early relapse or refractory disease had a higher probability of CR (6/7 vs 3/14 patients, P=0.017) and overall survival (71 vs 21%, P<0.05, 24–49 months follow-up). In conclusion, high-dose treosulfan as major therapy component induces sustained complete remissions in relapsed high-grade lymphoma with acceptable toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeck A et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1540–1545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C . Therapy intensification with autologous transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Bull Cancer 2001; 88: 877–887.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta V, Lazarus HM, Keating A . Myeloablative conditioning regimens for AML allografts: 30 years later. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 969–978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones RJ, Lee KS, Beschorner WE et al. Venoocclusive disease of the liver following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1987; 44: 778–783.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hänel M, Kröger N, Sonnenberg S et al. Busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide as high-dose conditioning regimen in patients with malignant lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2002; 81: 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slattery JT, Risler LJ . Therapeutic monitoring of busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 1998; 20: 543–549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassan M . The role of busulfan in bone marrow transplantation. Med Oncol 1999; 16: 166–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. De La Camera R, Thomas JF, Figuera A et al. High dose busulfan and seizures. Bone Marrow Transplant 1991; 7: 363–364.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feit PW . Stereoisomer 1,4-di-O-methansulfonyl-butan-1,2,3,4-tetrole. Tetrahedron Lett 1961; 20: 716–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fenelly J . Treosulfan (hydroxybusulfan) in ovarian carcinoma. In: Nelson JD, Grassi C (eds). Current Chemotherapy and Infectious Disease. American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, 1980; pp 1683–1684.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meden H, Wittkop Y, Kuhn W . Maintenance chemotherapy with oral treosulfan following first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: feasibility and toxicity. Anticancer Res 1997; 17: 2221–2224.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheulen ME, Hilger RA, Oberhoff C et al. Clinical phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of high-dose chemotherapy with treosulfan and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 4209–4216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilger RA, Harstrick A, Eberhardt W et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of intravenous treosulfan in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1998; 42: 99–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meinhardt G, Dayyani F, Jahrsdorfer B et al. Treosulfan is an effective inducer of cell death in myeloma cell lines and primary myeloma cells from patients. Br J Haematol 2003; 122: 892–899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fichtner I, Becker M, Baumgart J . Antileukaemic activity of treosulfan in xenografted human acute lymphoblastic leukaemias (ALL). Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 801–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Casper J, Knauf W, Kiefer T et al. Treosulfan and fludarabine: a new toxicity-reduced conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003; 103: 725–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jantunen E, Kuittinen T, Nousiainen T . BEAC or BEAM for high-dose therapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma? A single centre analysis on toxicity and efficacy. Leukemia Lymphoma 2003; 44: 1151–1158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimoni A, Smith TL, Aleman A et al. Thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide (TBC) and autologous hematopoietic transplantation: an intensive regimen for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 821–828.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng T, Forsyth P, Chaudhry A et al. High-dose thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide and ASCT without whole-brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis primary CNS lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 679–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JL, Gooley T, Bensinger W et al. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver after busulfan, melphalan, and thiotepa conditioning therapy: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1999; 5: 306–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reiser M, Jostin A, Draube A et al. Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1223–1228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Junghanss C, Leithäuser M, Wilhem S et al. High-dose etoposide phosphate and G-CSF mobilizes peripheral blood stem cells in patients that previously failed to mobilize. Ann Hematol 2001; 80: 96–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moskowitz CH, Bertino JR, Glassman JR et al. Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a highly effective cytoreduction and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3776–3785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolwell BJ, Kalaycio M, Sobecks R et al. A multivariable analysis of factors influencing mucositis after autologous progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 587–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guglielmi C, Gomez F, Philip T et al. Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled in the PARMA trial. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3264–3269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vose JM, Zhang MJ, Rowlings PA et al. Autologous transplantation for diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients never achieving remission: a report from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 406–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seropian S, Bahceci E, Cooper DL . Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 763–769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bierman PJ, Sweetenham JW, Loberiza FR et al. Syngeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comparison with allogeneic and autologous transplantation – The Lymphoma Working Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3744–3753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mollee P, Lazarus HM, Lipton J . Why aren’t we performing more allografts for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma? Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 953–960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gisselbrecht C, Mounier N . Rituximab: enhancing outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Semin Oncol 2003; 30: 28–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Benekli M, Hahn T, Shafi F et al. Effect of rituximab on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment kinetics in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 139–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shimoni A, Hardan I, Avigdor A et al. Rituximab reduces relapse risk after allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2003; 122: 457–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Koenigsmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koenigsmann, M., Mohren, M., Jentsch-Ullrich, K. et al. High-dose treosulfan in patients with relapsed or refractory high-grade lymphoma receiving tandem autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 34, 477–483 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704626

  • Springer Nature Limited

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation