Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tests of generalizability can diversify psychology and improve theories

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Psychology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Diversifying psychology is fundamental to good science. Tests of generalizability using diverse samples can inform and constrain theories, leading to scientific progress and cumulative knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clancy, K. B. H. & Davis, J. L. Soylent is people, and WEIRD is white: biological anthropology, whiteness, and the limits of the WEIRD. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 48, 169–186 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C. & Arnett, J. J. The neglected 95% revisited: is American psychology becoming less American? Am. Psychol. 76, 116–129 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel, V. & Sumathipala, A. International representation in psychiatric journals: a survey of 6 leading journals. Br. J. Psychiatry 178, 406–409 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D. & Mortenson, E. Racial inequality in psychological research: trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1295–1309 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meehl, P. E. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46, 806–834 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McPhetres, J. et al. A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009-2019). PLoS ONE 16, e0247986 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, 1959).

  8. Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I. & Alloy, L. B. Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychologic. Rev. 96, 358–372 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. & Lakens, D. An excess of positive results: comparing the standard psychology literature with Registered Reports. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y. & Lindsay, D. S. Constraints on generality (COG): a proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1123–1128 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA

    Gerald J. Haeffel & Willie R. Cobb

Authors
  1. Gerald J. Haeffel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Willie R. Cobb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald J. Haeffel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haeffel, G.J., Cobb, W.R. Tests of generalizability can diversify psychology and improve theories. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 186–187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00039-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00039-x

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation