Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disaster risk communication requires dissemination, dialogue and participation

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Disaster risk communication traditionally focuses on authorities conveying hazard and risk information to at-risk populations, with little consideration of local community knowledge. To enable risk reduction and resilience, disaster management must forge partnerships with local communities and empower citizen-led initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1: The disaster risk communication continuum.

References

  1. Fakhruddin, B., Clark, H., Robinson, L. & Hieber-Girardet, L. Should I stay or should I go now? Why risk communication is the critical component in disaster risk reduction. Prog. Disaster Sci. 8, 100139 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lejano, R. P., Haque, C. E. & Berkes, F. Co-production of risk knowledge and improvement of risk communication: A three-legged stool. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 64, 102508 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. In UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015).

  4. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022).

  5. Donovan, A. R., Borie, M. A. H. & Blackburn, S. E. Changing the paradigm for risk communication: integrating sciences to understand cultures. In Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR 2019) (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019).

  6. Alexander, D. E. Communicating earthquake risk to the public: the trial of the “L’Aquila Seven”. Nat. Hazards 72, 1159–1173 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on the Science of Science Communication. Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, 2017).

  8. Meyer, R. & Kunreuther, H. The Ostrich Paradox: Why we Underprepare for Disasters (Univ. Pennsylvania Press, 2017).

  9. Hicks, A. et al. Global mapping of citizen science projects for disaster risk reduction. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 226 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cremen, G. et al. A state-of-the-art decision-support environment for risk-sensitive and pro-poor urban planning and design in Tomorrow’s cities. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 85, 103400 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sevilla, E. et al. Envisioning the future by learning from the past: Arts and humanities in interdisciplinary tools for promoting a culture of risk. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 92, 103712 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding from UKRI GCRF under grant NE/S009000/1, Tomorrow’s Cities Hub.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Scientific Society, Amman, Jordan

    I. S. Stewart

  2. College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador

    E. Sevilla & K. Barragán

  3. Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey

    E. Yahya Menteşe

Authors
  1. I. S. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Sevilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Barragán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Yahya Menteşe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I.S.S. prepared an initial draft manuscript and all authors contributed equally to its revision. All authors contributed to and approved the submitted version. I.S.S. conceived and K.B. designed and drafted the artwork.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. S. Stewart.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, I.S., Sevilla, E., Barragán, K. et al. Disaster risk communication requires dissemination, dialogue and participation. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 805–806 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00506-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00506-w

  • Springer Nature Limited

Search

Navigation