Skip to main content
Log in

Substance classification of titanium dioxide illustrates limitations of EU legislation

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Food

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The harmonized classification of titanium dioxide as a suspected carcinogen has the potential to misinform consumers and promote aversive behaviour. The case exemplifies the limits of a hazard-based classification system that should not be used without exposure assessment in downstream, sector-specific legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 (European Commission, 2020); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/217/oj.

  2. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2008); http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/1272/oj

  3. CLH Report for Titanium Dioxide (ANSES, 2016); https://go.nature.com/3aJ23Cp

  4. RAC Opinion Proposing Harmonised Classification and Labelling at EU Level of Titanium Dioxide (ECHA, 2017); https://go.nature.com/3aHyXUj

  5. Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria: Guidance to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of Substances and Mixtures (ECHA, 2017); https://go.nature.com/3ggE5zL

  6. Cole, C., Shyr, T. & Ou-Yang, H. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 32, 5–10 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety Opinion on Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Used in Cosmetic Products (European Commission, 2020); https://go.nature.com/2E85mqY

  8. Arrêté du 17 Avril 2019 Portant Suspension de la Mise Sur le Marché des Denrées Contenant l'Additif E 171 (Dioxyde de Titane - TiO2) [in French] (République Française, 2019); https://go.nature.com/2EnG6N7

  9. Bettini, S. et al. Sci. Rep. 7, 40373 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott, N. A. & Mann, E. R. Immunology 159, 26–38 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) EFSA J. 16, e05366 (2018).

  12. Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 (European Commission, 2011); http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/10/2019-08-29

  13. Borm, P., Cassee, F. R. & Oberdorster, G. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 12, 10 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2006); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2006/1907/oj

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Riebeling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riebeling, C., Haase, A., Tralau, T. et al. Substance classification of titanium dioxide illustrates limitations of EU legislation. Nat Food 1, 523–525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00149-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00149-w

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation