Europe’s data protection laws must evolve to guard against pervasive inferential analytics in nascent digital technologies such as edge computing.
References
Wachter, S. Law Innov. Technol. 10, 266–294 (2018).
Peppet, S. R. Texas Law Rev. 93, 85–176 (2014).
Wachter, S. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 34, 436–449 (2017).
Ohm, P. UCLA Law Rev. 57, 1701–1777 (2009).
Hildebrandt, M. in Profiling the European Citizen (eds Hildebrandt, M. & Gutwirth, S.) 303–343 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2008).
Mittelstadt, B. Philos. Technol. 30, 475–494 (2017).
YS, M and S v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel [2014] ECJ C-141/12, C-372/12.
Peter Nowak v. Data Protection Commissioner [2017] ECJ C‑434/16.
Kathleen Egan and Margaret Hackett v. European Parliament [2012] EGC T‑190/10.
Zarsky, T. Seton Hall Law Rev. 47, 995–1020 (2017).
Wachter, S. & Mittelstadt, B. Columbia Bus. Law Rev. (in the press); https://ssrn.com/abstract=3248829
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wachter, S. Data protection in the age of big data. Nat Electron 2, 6–7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0193-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0193-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The open texture of ‘algorithm’ in legal language
AI & SOCIETY (2024)
-
Capturing Human Environmental DNA: Ethical Challenges
Digital Society (2023)
-
Inferences and the Right to Privacy
The Journal of Value Inquiry (2022)