Exploring the evolution, from analysis and endpoints to registration and regulations
Change history
04 April 2019
The published online date in the HTML version of this article was originally 07 January 2018. The article was actually published online on 07 January 2019. The date has been updated.
References
Huang, G. D. et al. Cont. Clin. Trials 66, 74–79 (2018).
Redfearn, S. CenterWatch Weekly (11 June 2018).
Kaitin, K. I. Rising protocol complexity is hindering study performance, cost, and efficiency (Tufts CSDD Impact Report July/August) (Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 2018).
da Costa, B. R. & Juni, P. Eur. Heart J. 35, 3336–3345 (2014).
Greco, T., Zangrillo, A., Biondi-Zoccai, G. & Landoni, G. Heart Lung Vessel 5, 219–225 (2013).
Taichman, D. B. et al. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 17, 2491–2492 (2017).
Wasserstein, R. L. & Lazar, N. A. Am. Stat. 70, 129–133 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
May, M. Twenty-five ways clinical trials have changed in the last 25 years. Nat Med 25, 2–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0314-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0314-1
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Targeting metastatic cancer
Nature Medicine (2021)
-
Decentralized Learning with Virtual Patients for Medical Diagnosis of Diabetes
SN Computer Science (2021)
-
Utilizing open-source platforms to build and deploy interactive patient-reported quality of life tracking tools for monitoring protocol adherence
Quality of Life Research (2021)