Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the ‘CRISPR babies’ experiment?

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marchione, M. & Larson, C. Could anyone have stopped gene-edited babies experiment? AP News https://apnews.com/8d79b8da09624aabbec28d1227650a66 (2 December 2018).

  2. Regalado, A. Rogue Chinese CRISPR scientist cited US report as his green light. MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612472/rogue-chinese-crispr-scientist-cited-us-report-as-his-green-light/ (27 November 2018).

  3. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome editing and human reproduction. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-FINAL-website.pdf (2018)

  4. Sample, I. Genetically modified babies given go ahead by UK ethics body. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/jul/17/genetically-modified-babies-given-go-ahead-by-uk-ethics-body (17 July 2018).

  5. Knapton, S. Designer babies on horizon as ethics council gives green light to genetically edited embryos. The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/07/16/designer-babies-horizon-ethics-council-gives-green-light-genetically/ (17 July 2018).

  6. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome editing and human reproduction: social and ethical issues — short guide. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-short-guide-website.pdf (2018).

  7. Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickenson, D. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 743 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genome-and-human-rights/ (1997).

  10. Council of Europe. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. European Treaty Series – No. 164. https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98 (1997).

  11. Council of Europe. Explanatory report to the convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. European Treaty Series – No. 164. https://rm.coe.int/16800ccde5IIn (1997).

  12. Haeartel, I. International Perspectives' report. Nuffield Council on Bioethics conference on ‘Genome editing in human reproduction: ethical issues'. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/about/events (23 July 2018).

  13. National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. On human gene editing: international summit statement. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12032015a (3 December 2015).

  14. Anonymous. Lancet 392, 253 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of London, London, UK

    Donna Dickenson

  2. Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Donna Dickenson

  3. Center for Genetics and Society, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Marcy Darnovsky

Authors
  1. Donna Dickenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcy Darnovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Dickenson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dickenson, D., Darnovsky, M. Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the ‘CRISPR babies’ experiment?. Nat Biotechnol 37, 355–357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0077-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0077-3

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation