Data availability
All materials, data and code used in the studies are available at https://osf.io/wy8tq/?view_only=e5907f552f5e4a8a901cbdd2d4c035f6.
References
Awad, E. et al. The Moral Machine experiment. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018).
Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R. & Smirnov, O. Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature 446, 794–796 (2007).
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H. & Rockenbach, B. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454, 1079–1083 (2008).
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002).
Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A. & Rahwan, I. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352, 1573–1576 (2016).
Li, J., Zhao, X., Cho, M.-J., Ju, W. & Malle, B. F. From trolley to autonomous vehicle:perceptions of responsibility and moral norms in traffic accidents with self-driving cars. SAE Technical Paper https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0164 (2016).
Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R. & Hütter, M. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 113, 343–376 (2017).
Spranca, M., Minsk, E. & Baron, J. Omission and commission in judgment and choice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 27, 76–105 (1991).
Luetge, C. The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving. Philos. Technol. 30, 547–558 (2017).
Gertler, P., Galiani, S. & Romero, M. How to make replication the norm. Nature 554, 417–419 (2018).
Bigman, Y. E. & Gray, K. People are averse to machines making moral decisions. Cognition 181, 21–34 (2018).
Bigman, Y. E., Waytz, A., Alterovitz, R. & Gray, K. Holding Robots Responsible: The Elements of Machine Morality. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 365–368 (2019).
Banaji, M. R. & Greenwald, A. G. Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People (Bantam Books, 2016).
Acknowledgements
Y.E.B. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (SMA-1714298). K.G. acknowledges support from the Charles Koch Foundation and from the National Science Foundation (BCS-1823944).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.E.B. and K.G. planned the research, designed the experiment, collected the data, analysed the data and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Supplementary Figure 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bigman, Y.E., Gray, K. Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles. Nature 579, E1–E2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1987-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1987-4
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The risk ethics of autonomous vehicles: an empirical approach
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Understanding social attitudes towards autonomous driving: a perspective from Chinese citizens
Transportation (2024)
-
Trolleys, crashes, and perception—a survey on how current autonomous vehicles debates invoke problematic expectations
AI and Ethics (2024)
-
What should AI see? Using the public’s opinion to determine the perception of an AI
AI and Ethics (2023)
-
A multimodal psychological, physiological and behavioural dataset for human emotions in driving tasks
Scientific Data (2022)