Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The future of pelvic lymph node dissection for urological malignancies

  • Clinical Outlook
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Controversies over how, why and when pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) should be performed persist. Available data suggest that a limited number of patients will experience a curative benefit from PLND, but it remains the most tried and tested diagnostic tool for staging. New techniques aim to improve noninvasive detection of diseased nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Herr, H. W. et al. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 2781–2789 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Washington, S. L. III, Carroll, P. R. & Porten, S. P. in Cancer Metastasis Through the Lymphovascular System (eds Leong, S. P., Nathanson, S. D. & Zager, J. S.) 587–592 (Springer, 2022).

  3. Voskuilen, C. S. et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography for lymph node staging in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 3, 73–79 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen, D. P. et al. A specific mapping study using fluorescence sentinel lymph node detection in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Eur. Urol. 70, 734–737 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schilham, M. G. M. et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT and ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients. J. Nucl. Med. 62, 1258–1263 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suarez-Ibarrola, R. et al. Is there an oncological benefit of performing bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer and inguinal lymph node metastasis? J. Clin. Med. 10, 754 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seisen, T. et al. Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J. Urol. 35, 535–548 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gschwend, J. E. et al. Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial. Eur. Urol. 75, 604–611 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lestingi, J. F. P. et al. Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: early oncological outcomes from a randomized phase 3 trial. Eur. Urol. 79, 595–604 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gallus B. Ineichen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

ClinicalTrials.gov PLND trials: https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/search?patient=pelvic%20lymph%20node%20dissection&locStr=&distance=0&page=2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ineichen, G.B., Burkhard, F.C. The future of pelvic lymph node dissection for urological malignancies. Nat Rev Urol 19, 575–576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-022-00641-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-022-00641-x

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation