Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radical prostatectomy — aftercare should not be an afterthought

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Focus on quality of life after prostate cancer is vital to improve patient care. Improved assessment and proactive management of post-treatment functional outcomes is essential. Many aspects of the patients’ aftercare need to be improved in order to set up a clear path following prostatectomy. These improvements will enable a timely and efficient escalation of treatment and ameliorate patients’ survivorship experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cancer Research UK. Prostate cancer. Cancer Research UK https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/prostate-cancer (2019).

  2. Department of Health, Macmillan Cancer Support & NHS Improvement. Living with and beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes. Department of Health https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181054/9333-TSO-2900664-NCSI_Report_FINAL.pdf (2013).

  3. Tal, R., Alphs, H. H., Krebs, P., Nelson, C. J. & Mulhall, J. P. Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. J. Sex. Med. 6, 2538–2546 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kretschmer, A., Hübner, W., Sandhu, J. S. & Bauer, R. M. Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature. Eur. Urol. Focus 2, 245–259 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gontero, P. et al. Is there an optimal time for intracavernous prostaglandin E1 rehabilitation following nonnerve sparing radical prostatectomy? Results from a hemodynamic prospective study. J. Urol. 169, 2166–2169 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Venderbos, L. D. F. et al. Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS): descriptive statistics of a prostate cancer survey from patients for patients. Eur. Urol. Focus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.002 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratcliff, C. G., Cohen, L., Pettaway, C. A. & Parker, P. A. Treatment regret and quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Support. Care Cancer 21, 3337–3343 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, N. E. et al. Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 67, 460–467 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Protopapa, E., van der Meulen, J., Moore, C. M. & Smith, S. C. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires for men who have radical surgery for prostate cancer: a conceptual review of existing instruments. BJU Int. 120, 468–481 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn, J. et al. Prostate cancer survivorship essentials framework: guidelines for practitioners. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15159 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Findlay MacAskill.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.S., M.S. and F.M. have received an unrestricted educational grant from Boston Scientific.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacAskill, F., Sahai, A., Shabbir, M. et al. Radical prostatectomy — aftercare should not be an afterthought. Nat Rev Urol 18, 703–704 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00526-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00526-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation