Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HEALTH POLICY

If patients are the true north, patient-centeredness should guide research

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Rheumatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

‘Patient-centered’ research has traditionally meant that researchers and clinicians design trials for the benefit of patients. By contrast, patients today are central to study design and reporting outcomes, and new research agendas recognize that patients can point the way to research questions and how to address them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Schoemaker, C. G. et al. Dutch juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, carers and clinicians create a research agenda together following the James Lind Alliance method: a study protocol. Pediatr. Rheumatol. Online J. 16, 57 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Partridge, N. & Scadding, J. The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet 364, 1923–1924 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Domecq, J. P. et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 89 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute for Health Research. INVOLVE | INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE http://www.invo.org.uk (2018).

  5. US Department fo Health and Human Services. Principles of community engagement, second edition. ATSDR https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf (2018).

  6. Selby, J. V. et al. Multistakeholder engagement in PCORnet, the national patient-centered clinical research network. Med. Care 56 (Suppl. 1), S4–S5 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Medicine. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary (eds Olsen, L., Aisner, D. & McGinnis, J. M.) (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2007).

  8. Sheridan, S. et al. The PCORI engagement rubric: promising practices for partnering in research. Ann. Fam. Med. 15, 165–170 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mullins, C. D., Abdulhalim, A. M. & Lavallee, D. C. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 307, 1587–1588 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge that the views expressed in this article are informed by their research funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (C.D.M.) and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (C.D.M. and L.E.S.). The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, its Board of Governors, or Methodology Committee. No statement should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Daniel Mullins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

C.D.M. and L.E.S. declare that they each received a research contract from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schanberg, L.E., Mullins, C.D. If patients are the true north, patient-centeredness should guide research. Nat Rev Rheumatol 15, 5–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-018-0129-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-018-0129-y

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation