The FDA approvals of siponimod and cladribine for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis raise questions about the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis phenotypes and their applicability to clinical trials. A simpler classification for the disease could be the answer.
References
Kappos, L. et al. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet 391, 1263–1273 (2018).
Polman, C. H. et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald criteria”. Ann. Neurol. 58, 840–846 (2005).
Thompson, A. J. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 17, 162–173 (2018).
Lublin, F. D. et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 83, 278–286 (2014).
Montalban, X. et al. Cladribine tablets added to IFN-beta in active relapsing MS: the ONWARD study. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 5, e477 (2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
O.S. serves on the editorial board of Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, has served on data monitoring committees for Genentech–Roche, Pfizer and TG Therapeutics without monetary compensation, has advised Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme and Serono, and has received grant support from Sanofi Genzyme. N.M. declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manouchehri, N., Stüve, O. Trials and therapies in secondary progressive MS, simplified. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 431–432 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0233-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0233-x
- Springer Nature Limited