Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening

The promise of AI in personalized breast cancer screening: are we there yet?

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

The benefits and potential harms of mammography-based screening for breast cancer are often a matter of debate. Here, I discuss the promises and limitations of a recent study that tested an artificial intelligence-based tool for the detection of breast cancer in digital mammograms in a large, prospective screening setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Yala, A. et al. Multi-institutional validation of a mammography-based breast cancer risk model. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 1732–1740 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehman, C. D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Intern. Med. 175, 1828–1837 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A. & Metz, C. E. Computer-aided screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 84 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lång, K. et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 24, 936–944 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yala, A., Lehman, C., Schuster, T., Portnoi, T. & Barzilay, R. A deep learning mammography-based model for improved breast cancer risk prediction. Radiology 292, 60–66 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng, A. Y. et al. Prospective implementation of AI-assisted screen reading to improve early detection of breast cancer. Nat. Med. 29, 3044–3049 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma, N. et al. Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms. BMC Cancer 23, 460 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Conant, E. F. et al. Mammographic screening in routine practice: multisite study of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography screenings. Radiology 307, e221571 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zuckerman, S. P., Sprague, B. L., Weaver, D. L., Herschorn, S. D. & Conant, E. F. Multicenter evaluation of breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with synthetic versus digital mammography. Radiology 297, 545–553 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoon, J. H. et al. Standalone AI for breast cancer detection at screening digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 307, e222639 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Despina Kontos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.K. has received honoraria for speaker roles at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Society of Breast Imaging, SPIE Medical Imaging Symposium, Stanford University and University of Hawaii, and her institution receives research funding from Calico, GenMab and iCAD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontos, D. The promise of AI in personalized breast cancer screening: are we there yet?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 21, 403–404 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00877-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00877-z

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation