Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modern chemistry is rubbish

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Chemistry

View current issue Sign up to alerts

To combat worsening environmental crises, chemistry needs a redesign. We see the need for a triple focus on efficiency, safety and circularity as a prerequisite for chemistry to serve sustainability and ensure that essential chemical products and processes are waste-free, functional and safe for both humans and the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1: The future of chemistry.

References

  1. Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Persson, L. et al. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 1510–1521 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Anastas, P. T. & Warner, J. C. (eds) Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).

  4. Krasnodębski, M. Lost green chemistries: history of forgotten environmental trajectories. Centaurus 64, 509–536 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugiyama, M. et al. Electron in a cube: synthesis and characterization of perfluorocubane as an electron acceptor. Science 377, 756–759 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahaffy, P. G., Matlin, S. A., Holme, T. A. & MacKellar, J. Systems thinking for education about the molecular basis of sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 2, 362–370 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galán-Martín, Á. et al. Sustainability footprints of a renewable carbon transition for the petrochemical sector within planetary boundaries. One Earth 4, 565–583 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keijer, T., Bakker, V. & Slootweg, J. C. Circular chemistry to enable a circular economy. Nat. Chem. 11, 190–195 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caldeira, C. et al. Safe and sustainable by design chemicals and materials: review of safety and sustainability dimensions, aspects, methods, indicators, and tools (Publications Office of the European Union, 2022).

  10. Kümmerer, K., Clark, J. H. & Zuin, V. G. Rethinking chemistry for a circular economy. Science 367, 369–370 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Van ’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, Research Priority Area Sustainable Chemistry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hannah Flerlage & J. Chris Slootweg

Authors
  1. Hannah Flerlage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Chris Slootweg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Chris Slootweg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flerlage, H., Slootweg, J.C. Modern chemistry is rubbish. Nat Rev Chem 7, 593–594 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00523-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00523-9

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation