Skip to main content
Log in

Less breadth more depth

  • In the Classroom
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Chemistry

View current issue Sign up to alerts
  • 11 Altmetric

Chemistry degrees are often very broad. What might a degree look like if we covered fewer topics more deeply?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: The breadth and depth of topic coverage in a degree emphasize different relationships to knowledge for students.

References

  1. Ramsden, P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education (Routledge, 2003).

  2. Kaiser, N. Mimicry is not mastery. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 197–198 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Krathwohl, D. R. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Pract. 41, 212–218 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (David McKay, 1956).

  5. What do graduates do? 2021/22 (JISC/AGCAS, 2022); https://graduatemarkettrends.cdn.prismic.io/graduatemarkettrends/8d0f5a43-fe6e-4b78-b710-4c22baa1db5e_what-do-graduates-do-2021-22.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael O’Neill.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Neill, M. Less breadth more depth. Nat Rev Chem 6, 444–445 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00402-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00402-9

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation