The importance of reproducible scientific practices is widely acknowledged. However, limited resources and lack of external incentives have hindered their adoption. Here, we explore ways to promote reproducible science in practice.
References
Christensen, G. et al. Open science practices are on the rise: the State of Social Science (3S) survey. escholarship.org, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hx0207r (2020).
Allen, C. & Mehler, D. M. A. PLoS Biol 17, e3000246 (2019).
Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P. & Willmes, K. Cortex 66, A1–A2 (2015).
Eder, A. B. & Frings, C. Exp. Psychol 68, 1–3 (2021).
Houtkoop, B. L. et al. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1, 70–85 (2018).
Paret, C. et al. Neuroimage 257, 119306 (2022).
Niso, G. et al. Neuroimage 263, 119623 (2022).
Rahal, R.-M. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 164–167 (2023).
Stodden, V. et al. Science 354, 1240–1241 (2016).
Holcombe, A. O. Publications 7, 48 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of the ReproducibiliTea Nottingham Journal Club for their helpful feedback and discussion on a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinerova, J., Botvinik-Nezer, R. & Tibon, R. Five creative ways to promote reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav 8, 411–413 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01808-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01808-1
- Springer Nature Limited