Large language models (LLMs) are impressive technological creations but they cannot replace all scientific theories of cognition. A science of cognition must focus on humans as embodied, social animals who are embedded in material, cultural and technological contexts.
References
Dreyfus, H. What Computers Can’t Do (Harper and Row, 1972).
Lanier, J. There is no A.I. The New Yorker (20 April 2023).
Ayers, J. W. et al. JAMA Intern. Med. 183, 589–596 (2023).
Birhane, A. et al. The values encoded in machine learning research. In Proc. 2022 ACM Conf. on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 173–184 (ACM, 2022).
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children (Paul H. Brookes Publishing, 1995).
Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. The Embodied Mind (The MIT Press, 1991).
Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C. & De Jaegher, H. Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity Between Life and Language (MIT Press, 2018).
Dingemanse, M. et al. Cogn. Sci. 47, e13230 (2023).
Cecutti, L. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 973–975 (2021).
Adams, Z. & Browning, J. eds. Giving a Damn: Essays in Dialogue with John Haugeland (The MIT Press, 2016).
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Z. Biener, A. Chemero and E. Feiten for comments on an earlier draft. Work on this Comment was supported by the Charles Phelps Taft Research Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Human Behaviour thanks Mark Dingemanse, Ishita Dasgupta, and Julian Kiverstein for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chemero, A. LLMs differ from human cognition because they are not embodied. Nat Hum Behav 7, 1828–1829 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01723-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01723-5
- Springer Nature Limited