Combining numerical information on-the-fly is crucial for making advantageous decisions, but precisely how humans are able to track and compare magnitudes is unclear. Experiments now suggest that when it comes to performing such tasks, not all numbers are created equal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Spitzer, B., Waschke, L. & Summerfield, C. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0145 (2017).
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A. R. Science 275, 1293–1295 (1997).
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E. & Pica, P. Science 320, 1217–1220 (2008).
Dehaene, S. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 145–147 (2003).
Anderson, P. W. Science 177, 393–396 (1972).
Núñez, R. E. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42, 651–668 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kievit, R. Cognitive neuroscience: More is different. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0162
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0162
- Springer Nature Limited