Despite significant investment, contemporary anticorruption efforts have failed to be effective. A new index — the Index of Public Integrity — offers a transparent, evidence-based approach to controlling corruption and measuring progress.
References
Analysis of USAID Anticorruption Programming Worldwide (2007–2013) Final Report (USAID, 2014).
EU Aid to Turkey – Money Well Spent? (ERCAS); http://go.nature.com/2gtHHRM
Klitgaard, R. Addressing Corruption Together (OECD, 2015).
EU Support for Governance in Egypt — “Well-Intentioned but Ineffective”, Say EU Auditors (European Court Of Auditors, 2013); http://go.nature.com/2gnFl5o
Dahl, R. A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (Yale Univ. Press, 1973).
The Quest for Good Governance. How Societies Develop Control of Corruption (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. & Dadašov, R. Eur. J. Crim. Pol. Res. 22, 415–438 (2016).
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. et al. Public Integrity and Trust in the European Union (ERCAS, Hertie School of Governance, 2015).
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. The time has come for evidence-based anticorruption. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0011
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0011
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The promise and perils of using artificial intelligence to fight corruption
Nature Machine Intelligence (2022)
-
Bad machines corrupt good morals
Nature Human Behaviour (2021)
-
Measuring Corruption: A Critical Analysis of the Existing Datasets and Their Suitability for Diachronic Transnational Research
Social Indicators Research (2021)
-
Measuring accountability performance and its relevance for anti-corruption: introducing a new integrity system-based measure
Crime, Law and Social Change (2017)