Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon parks could secure essential ecosystems for climate stabilization

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Achieving net-zero targets and climate stabilization will require better accounting for the immense amount of carbon naturally stored belowground. We propose ‘carbon parks’ as a conservation tool and financial instrument to protect and value carbon-rich ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Main tools aimed at promoting biodiversity conservation and climate change abatement.
Fig. 2: A peatland in Karukinka, southern Patagonia.

References

  1. Anderegg, W. R. L. AGU Advances 2, e2021AV000490 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein, A. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 287–295 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanneberger, F. et al. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 5, 2000146 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Paustian, K. et al. Nature 532, 49–57 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Magill, B. Biden climate plan to save forests pivots on swamps, wetland (1). Bloomberg Law, https://go.nature.com/3gzaYKM (2 November 2021).

  6. Meier, J. Designating Dark Sky Areas: Actors and Interests (Routledge, 2014).

  7. Climate Action Reserve. Key Accounting Principles for Improved Forest Management Projects within the Forest Protocol (Climate Action Reserve, 2019).

  8. Verified Carbon Standard. VM0007 REDD+ Methodology Framework (REDD+ MF), v1.6. verra.org, https://go.nature.com/3GCEKbZ (8 September 2020).

  9. PCAF. The Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry (Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials, 2021).

  10. Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J. & Holden, J. Catena 160, 134–140 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, Z., Loisel, J., Brosseau, D. P., Beilman, D. W. & Hunt, S. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L13402 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loisel, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 70–77 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leifeld, J., Wüst-Galley, C. & Page, S. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 945–947 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leifeld, J. & Menichetti, L. Nat. Commun. 9, 1071 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Juffe-Bignoli, D. et al. Protected Planet Report 2014 (UNEP-WCMC: 2014).

  16. Hoyos-Santillan, J., Miranda, A., Lara, A., Rojas, M. & Sepulveda-Jauregui, A. Science 366, 1207–1208 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. von Unger, M. & Emmer, I. Carbon Market Incentives to Conserve, Restore and Enhance Soil Carbon. (The Nature Conservancy, 2018).

  18. Bonn, A. et al. (eds). Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).

  19. Buotte, P. C., Law, B. E., Ripple, W. J. & Berner, L. T. Ecol. Appl. 30, e02039 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soto-Navarro, C. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 375, 20190128 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Loisel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loisel, J., Walenta, J. Carbon parks could secure essential ecosystems for climate stabilization. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 486–488 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01695-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01695-1

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation