Global priority maps have been transformative for conservation, but now have questionable utility and may crowd out other forms of research. Conservation must re-engage with contextually rich knowledge that builds global understanding from the ground up.
References
Evans, M. Environ. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892921000114 (2021).
Brooks, T. M. et al. Science 313, 58–61 (2006).
Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. Nature 405, 243–253 (2000).
Myers, N. Bioscience 53, 916–917 (2003).
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
Hulme, M. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 558–564 (2010).
Kullberg, P. & Moilanen, A. Nat. Conserv. 12, 3–10 (2014).
McIntosh, E. J., Pressey, R. L., Lloyd, S., Smith, R. J. & Grenyer, R. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 677–697 (2017).
Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A. & Hulme, M. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 18, 65–72 (2016).
Evans, M. C., Davila, F., Toomey, A. & Wyborn, C. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1588 (2017).
Halpern, B. S., Regan, H. M., Possingham, H. P. & McCarthy, M. A. Ecol. Lett. 9, 2–11 (2006).
Mokany, K. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9906–9911 (2020).
Moffette, F., Alix-Garcia, J., Shea, K. & Pickens, A. H. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 172–178 (2021).
zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 035003 (2020).
Schmidt-Traub, G. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01533-w (2021).
Obermeister, N. Sustain. Sci. 14, 843–856 (2019).
Sinclair, S. P. et al. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12459 (2018).
Mammides, C. et al. Biol. Conserv. 198, 78–83 (2016).
Turnhout, E. & Boonman-Berson, S. Ecol. Soc. 16, 35 (2011).
Malavasi, M. Biol. Conserv. 252, 108843 (2020).
Lahsen, M. & Turnhout, E. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 025008 (2021).
Barnes, M. D., Glew, L., Wyborn, C. & Craigie, I. D. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 759–762 (2018).
Popkin, G. Science https://doi.org/gpzx (24 October 2019).
Tengö, M. et al. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 17–25 (2017).
Temper, L., del Bene, D. & Martinez-Alier, J. J. Political Ecol. 22, 255–278 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Fig. 1 and references.
Supplementary Data
Global priority mapping papers included in the analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wyborn, C., Evans, M.C. Conservation needs to break free from global priority mapping. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 1322–1324 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01540-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01540-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The global relevance of locally grounded ethnobiology
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2024)
-
A new R package to parse plant species occurrence records into unique collection events efficiently reduces data redundancy
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Bridging local and scientific knowledge for area-based conservation of useful plants in Colombia
Ambio (2024)
-
Enabling conservation theories of change
Nature Sustainability (2023)
-
30×30 biodiversity gains rely on national coordination
Nature Communications (2023)