Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to: Lunar illuminated fraction is a poor proxy for moonlight exposure

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The Original Article was published on 03 February 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kyba, C. C. M., Conrad, J. & Shatwell, T. Lunar illuminated fraction is a poor proxy for moonlight exposure. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1096-7 (2020).

  2. San-Jose, L. M. et al. Differential fitness effects of moonlight on plumage colour morphs in barn owls. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1331–1340 (2019).

  3. Janiczek, P. M. & DeYoung, J. A. Computer Programs for Sun and Moon Illuminance with Contingent Tables and Diagrams (US Naval Observatory, 1987); https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a182110.pdf

  4. Kronfeld-Schor, N. et al. Chronobiology by moonlight. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20123088 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hänel, A. et al. Measuring night sky brightness: methods and challenges. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 205, 278–290 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Conrad and T. Shatwell for providing us with the data on predicted illuminance. We acknowledge funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 173178) to A.R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.M.S.-J. reran the statistical models, and L.M.S.-J. and A.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Luis M. San-Jose or Alexandre Roulin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

San-Jose, L.M., Roulin, A. Reply to: Lunar illuminated fraction is a poor proxy for moonlight exposure. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 320–321 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1097-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1097-6

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation