Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disease ecology

A batty concept goes viral

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A field test suggests that orally ingestible, spreadable vaccines to combat rabies will transmit widely among vampire bats in the wild, offering a more humane — and effective — alternative to the bat culling practiced throughout Latin America today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Population-level susceptibility to rabies is elevated under culling versus spreadable vaccine interventions.

References

  1. Bärnighausen, T., Bloom, D. E., Cafiero-Fonseca, E. T. & O’Brien, J. C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12313–12319 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basinski, A. J. et al. Vaccine 36, 675–682 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bull, J. J., Smithson, M. W. & Nuismer, S. L. Trends Microbiol. 26, 6–15 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakker, K. M. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1032-x (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Belotto, A., Leanes, L. F., Schneider, M. C., Tamayo, H. & Correa, E. Virus Res. 111, 5–12 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider, M. C. et al. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 25, 260–269 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Linhart, S. B., Crespo, R. F. & Mitchell, G. C. Bol. Oficina Sanit. Panam. 6, 31–38 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Streicker, D. G. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 3384–3392 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stading, B. et al. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005958 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stading, B. R. et al. Vaccine 34, 5352–5358 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aguilar-Setién, A. et al. J. Wildl. Dis. 38, 539–544 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguilar-Sétien, A. et al. Vaccine 16, 1122–1126 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Almeida, M. F., Martorelli, L. F. A., Aires, C. C., Barros, R. F. & Massad, E. Virus Res. 137, 275–277 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergner, L. M. et al. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 128–143 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, R. D., Elias, D. J. & Mitchell, G. C. J. Wildl. Manage. 41, 736–739 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Calisher, C. H., Childs, J. E., Field, H. E., Holmes, K. V. & Schountz, T. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19, 531–545 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cara E. Brook.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brook, C.E. A batty concept goes viral. Nat Ecol Evol 3, 1620–1621 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1045-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1045-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation