Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Regulations designed to prevent global inequalities in the use of genetic resources apply to both commercial and non-commercial research. Conflating the two may have unintended consequences for collaboration between the Global North and biodiverse countries in the Global South, which may promote global injustice rather than mitigate it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cock, M. Nature 467, 369 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Comizzoli, P. & Holt, W. V. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 28, 1145–1160 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jinnah, S. & Jungcurt, S. Science 323, 464–465 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez, S. I. & Biber-Klemm, S. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 2, 27–33 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schindel, D. E. Nature 467, 779–781 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schindel, D. E. & du Plessis, P. Nature 515, 37 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Medaglia, J. C. in International Environmental Law and the Global South (eds Alam, S. et al.) 192–213 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2015).

  8. Gross, T. National Study on ABS Implementation in Brazil (ABS Capacity Development Initiative, 2014); https://go.nature.com/2vk8tqU

  9. Study to Analyse Legal and Economic Aspects of Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS in the European Union (Institute for European Environmental Policy, 2012); https://go.nature.com/2Hvuub2

  10. Dedeurwaerdere, T., Melindi-Ghidi, P. & Arianna, B. Environ. Sci. Policy 55, 1–10 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KFPE A Guide for Transboundary Research Partnerships 2nd edn (Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries, 2014); https://go.nature.com/2JU4Cnq

  12. Biber-Klemm, S. & Martinez, S. I. in Research and Development on Genetic Resources—Public Domain Approaches in Implementing the Nagoya Protocol (eds Chege Kamau, E. et al.) 175–180 (Routledge, London, 2015).

  13. Pogge, T. in World Poverty and Human Rights (ed. Pogge, T.) 202–221 (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2002).

  14. Bleisch, B. & Schaber, P. Weltarmut und Ethik (Mentis, Paderborn, 2007).

  15. Nijar, G. S., Louafi, S. & Welch, E. W. Int. Environ. Agreem. 17, 607–621 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Schauz and S. I. Martinez for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the UZH Research Priority Program on ‘Global Change and Biodiversity’. F.A. was also supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number PP00P3_150698).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Deplazes-Zemp.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deplazes-Zemp, A., Abiven, S., Schaber, P. et al. The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 917–919 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0561-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0561-z

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation