Skip to main content
Log in

Software support for environmental evidence synthesis

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Evidence-based environmental management is being hindered by difficulties in locating, interpreting and synthesizing relevant information among vast scientific outputs. But software developments that allow enhanced collation and sharing of data will help.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: The synthesis gap.

References

  1. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. & Knight, T. M. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 305–308 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunderland, T., Sunderland-Groves, J., Shanley, P. & Campbell, B. Biotropica 41, 549–554 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutherland, W. J. & Wordley, C. F. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1215–1216 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toomey, A. H., Knight, A. T. & Barlow, J. Conserv. Lett. 10, 619–625 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (Sage, London, 2017).

  7. Borah, R., Brown, A. W., Capers, P. L. & Kaiser, K. A. BMJ Open 7, e01254 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKinnon, M. C., Cheng, S. H., Garside, R., Masuda, Y. J. & Miller, D. C. Nature 528, 185–187 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Olorisade, B. K., de Quincey, E., Brereton, P. & Andras, P. A critical analysis of studies that address the use of text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews. In Proc. 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 14 (ACM, New York, 2016).

  10. O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M. & Ananiadou, S. Syst. Rev. 4, 5 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Westgate, M. J., Barton, P. S., Pierson, J. C. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1606–1614 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas, J., McNaught, J. & Ananiadou, S. Res. Synth. Methods 2, 1–14 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olorisade, B. K., Brereton, P. & Andras, P. J. Biomed. Inform. 73, 1–13 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall, C. & Brereton, P. Systematic review toolbox: a catalogue of tools to support systematic reviews. In Proc. 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 23 (ACM, New York, 2015).

  16. Chang, J., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Gerrish, S., Wang, C. & Blei, D. M. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 22. (eds Bengio, Y., Schuurmans, D., Lafferty, J. D., Williams, C. K. I. & Culotta, A.) 288–296 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, 2009).

  17. Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering EBSE Technical Report Version 2.3 (EBSE, 2007).

  18. Turner, R. M., Bird, S. M. & Higgins, J. P. PLoS ONE 8, e59202 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D. & Rothstein, H. R. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 35, 215–247 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garner, P. et al. BMJ 354, i3507 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shemilt, I. et al. Res. Synth. Methods 5, 31–49 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ioannidis, J. P. A. PLoS Med. 13, e1002049 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Westgate, M. J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Conserv. Biol. 31, 1002–1007 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ziegler, C. R., Webb, J. A., Norton, S. B., Pullin, A. S. & Melcher, A. H. Ecol. Indic. 53, 61–69 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma, X., Fox, P., Narock, T. & Wilson, B. Earth Sci. Inform. 8, 1–3 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolkovich, E. M., Regetz, J. & O’Connor, M. I. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2102–2110 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D. & Kirk, S. Environ. Evid. 6, 1 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rathbone, J., Carter, M., Hoffmann, T. & Glasziou, P. System. Rev. 4, 6 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lajeunesse, M. J. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 323–330 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marshall, I. J., Kuiper, J. & Wallace, B. C. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 23, 193–201 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pick, J. L., Nakagawa, S. W. & Noble, D. W. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/247775 (2018).

  32. Wallace, B. C. et al. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 941–947 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin J. Westgate.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westgate, M.J., Haddaway, N.R., Cheng, S.H. et al. Software support for environmental evidence synthesis. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 588–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0502-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0502-x

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation