Skip to main content
Log in

Please do not disturb ecosystems further

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Clearing up after natural disturbances may not always be beneficial for the environment. We argue that a radical change is needed in the way ecosystems are managed; one that acknowledges the important role of disturbance dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Examples of ecosystems subject to natural disturbances and then subject to negative ecological impacts associated with subsequent human-derived disturbances.

References

  1. Schiermeier, Q. Nature 530, 393 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Romme, W. H., Everham, E. H., Frelich, L. E., Moritz, M. A. & Sparks, R. E. Ecosystems 1, 524–534 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blair, D. P., McBurney, L. M., Blanchard, W., Banks, S. C. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Ecol. Appl. 26, 2280–2301 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorn, S. et al. Forest Ecol. Manag. 364, 10–16 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, J. R., Spies, T. A. & Ganio, L. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10743–10748 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory, S. V. in Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century (eds Kohm, K. A. & Franklin, J. F. ) 69–85 (Island, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beudert, B. et al. Conserv. Lett. 8, 272–281 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Franklin, J. F. et al. Conserv. Practice 1, 8–17 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Banks, S. C. et al. Oikos 120, 26–37 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H. & Tinker, D. B. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 351–358 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banks, S. C. et al. Mol. Ecol. 24, 3831–3845 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Backer, D. M., Jensen, S. E. & McPherson, G. R. Conserv. Biol. 18, 937–944 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorn, S., Bässler, C., Svoboda, M. & Jörg Müller, J. Forest Ecol. Manag. http://doi.org/bwfp (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. Divers. Distrib. 20, 467–477 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Foster, D. R., Aber, J. B., Melillo, J. M., Bowden, R. D. & Bazzaz, F. A. BioScience 47, 437–445 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thorn, S. et al. Ecol. Lett. 19, 163–170 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, C., McCarthy, M. A. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Conserv. Lett. 7, 355–370 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Swanson, M. E. et al. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 117–125 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bä ssler, C. et al. Ecol. Indic. 65, 149–160 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindenmayer, D. B., Burton, P. J. & Franklin, J. F. Salvage Logging and its Ecological Consequences. (Island, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindenmayer, D. B. & Tambiah, C. R. Conserv. Biol. 19, 991 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Nieuwstadt, M. G., Shiel, D. & Kartawinata, D. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1183–1186 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David Lindenmayer, Simon Thorn or Sam Banks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindenmayer, D., Thorn, S. & Banks, S. Please do not disturb ecosystems further. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 0031 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0031

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0031

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation