Skip to main content
Log in

A nonlinear cloud response delays the warming effect of aerosol reductions

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Satellite-based analysis indicates that the relative change in cloud droplet number concentration with relative change in aerosol concentration is sublinear, contrary to common assumptions. The revised nonlinear method predicts that in heavily polluted regions the additional warming due to improvements in air quality will occur two to three decades later than predicted by the linear method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: OLS and sigmoidal methods to predict radiative forcing.

References

  1. Szopa, S. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021). This report summarizes short-lived climate forcers and their climate effects.

  2. Samset, B. H. et al. Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1020–1029 (2018). This paper examines increases in global mean surface temperature and precipitation after removing anthropogenic aerosol emissions.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellouin, N. et al. Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change. Rev. Geophys. 58, e2019RG000660 (2020). A review article that provides a range of aerosol radiative forcing based on multiple lines of evidence, including modelling approaches, theoretical considerations and observations.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jia, H., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Böhm, C. & Sourdeval, O. Addressing the difficulties in quantifying droplet number response to aerosol from satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 7353–7372 (2022). This paper examines factors that influence the quantification of the sensitivity of cloud droplet number to aerosol using satellite observations.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Golaz, J.-C. et al. The DOE E3SM Model version 2: overview of the physical model and initial model evaluation. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2022MS003156 (2022). This research paper shows that the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 (E3SMv2) underestimates the global mean temperature in the second half of the historical temperature record.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Jia, H. & Quaas, J. Nonlinearity of the cloud response postpones climate penalty of mitigating air pollution in polluted regions. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01775-5 (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

A nonlinear cloud response delays the warming effect of aerosol reductions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 901–902 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01783-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01783-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation