Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A mechanism for regional variations in snowpack melt under rising temperature

  • Article
  • Published:

From Nature Climate Change

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

As the planet warms, mountain snowpack is expected to melt progressively earlier each spring. However, analysis of measurements in the western United States shows that the change in the date when snowpack disappears is not uniform: for 1 °C of warming, snowpack disappears 30 days earlier in some regions, whereas there is almost no change in others. Here we present an idealized physical model that simulates the timing of snowpack melt under changing temperature and use it to show that this observed disparity in the sensitivity of snowpack disappearance to warming results from a mechanism related to the sinusoidal shape of the annual cycle of temperature. Applying this model globally, we show that under uniform warming the timing of snowpack disappearance will change most rapidly in coastal regions, the Arctic, the western United States, Central Europe and South America, with much smaller changes in the northern interiors of North America and Eurasia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Examples of observed snowpack for two water years.
Fig. 2: Maps of the sensitivity of the timing of snowpack date of disappearance to temperature.
Fig. 3: Comparisons of ∂ζ/∂T0 calculated from SNOTEL observations and reanalysis and from the VIC model.
Fig. 4: Global estimates of ∂ζ/∂T0.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

SNOTEL data are available from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/. NARR output is available from the National Centers for Environmental Information, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/model-data/model-datasets/north-american-regional-reanalysis-narr. The global reanalysis data used here are available from the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2/.

Code availability

Code for the VIC model is available at: https://vic.readthedocs.io/en/master/. Code used to run the VIC model, analyse model output and observations and generate the plots can be found at https://github.com/amatoevan/snowpack_zeta/.

References

  1. Cayan, D. R., Kammerdiener, S. A., Dettinger, M. D., Caprio, J. M. & Peterson, D. H. Changes in the onset of spring in the western United States. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 399–416 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart, I. T., Cayan, D. R. & Dettinger, M. D. Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J. Clim. 18, 1136–1155 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mote, P. W. Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in western North America. J. Clim. 19, 6209–6220 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mote, P. W., Li, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Xiao, M. & Engel, R. Dramatic declines in snowpack in the western US. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 1, 2 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doesken, N. & Judson, A. The Snow Booklet: A Guide to the Science, Climatology, and Measurement of Snow in the United States (Colorado State Univ., 1996).

  6. Lettenmaier, D. P. & Gan, T. Y. Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento–San Joaquin River basin, California, to global warming. Water Resour. Res. 26, 69–86 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamlet, A. F., Mote, P. W., Clark, M. P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the western United States. J. Clim. 18, 4545–4561 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luce, C. H., Lopez-Burgos, V. & Holden, Z. Sensitivity of snowpack storage to precipitation and temperature using spatial and temporal analog models. Water Resour. Res. 50, 9447–9462 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamlet, A. F. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River basin. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35, 1597–1623 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438, 303–309 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R. & Swetnam, T. W. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gergel, D. R., Nijssen, B., Abatzoglou, J. T., Lettenmaier, D. P. & Stumbaugh, M. R. Effects of climate change on snowpack and fire potential in the western USA. Climatic Change 141, 287–299 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng, X., Broxton, P. & Dawson, N. Snowpack change from 1982 to 2016 over conterminous United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12940–12947 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evan, A. T. A new method to characterize changes in the seasonal cycle of snowpack. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 58, 131–143 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierce, D. W. & Cayan, D. R. The uneven response of different snow measures to human-induced climate warming. J. Clim. 26, 4148–4167 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mankin, J. S. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Influence of temperature and precipitation variability on near-term snow trends. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1099–1116 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serreze, M. C., Clark, M. P., Armstrong, R. L., McGinnis, D. A. & Pulwarty, R. S. Characteristics of the western United States snowpack from snowpack telemetry (SNOTEL) data. Water Resour. Res. 35, 2145–2160 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mesinger, F. et al. North American regional reanalysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 87, 343–360 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mote, P. W., Hamlet, A. F., Clark, M. P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 39–49 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson, E. A. Development and testing of snow pack energy balance equations. Water Resour. Res. 4, 19–37 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Andreadis, K. M., Storck, P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments. Water Resour. Res. 45, W05429 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F. & Burges, S. J. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 99, 14415–14428 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamman, J. J., Nijssen, B., Bohn, T. J., Gergel, D. R. & Mao, Y. The Variable Infiltration Capacity model version 5 (VIC-5): infrastructure improvements for new applications and reproducibility. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 3481–3496 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gelaro, R. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Trujillo, E. & Molotch, N. P. Snowpack regimes of the western United States. Water Resour. Res. 50, 5611–5623 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holland, M. M. & Bitz, C. M. Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Clim. Dyn. 21, 221–232 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 12 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  28. Musselman, K. N., Clark, M. P., Liu, C., Ikeda, K. & Rasmussen, R. Slower snowmelt in a warmer world. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 214 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Musselman, K. N., Molotch, N. P. & Margulis, S. A. Snowmelt response to simulated warming across a large elevation gradient, southern Sierra Nevada, California. Cryosphere 11, 2847–2866 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office grant NA17OAR4310163 to the University of California, and the National Science Foundation grant OPP-1643445. These data and related items of information have not been formally disseminated by NOAA and do not represent any agency determination, view or policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.E. conceived the study, conducted the observational analysis and designed the numerical simulations. I.E. and A.E. developed the idealized model. A.E. and I.E analysed all results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amato Evan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review informationNature Climate Change thanks Nicholas Siler, Xubin Zeng and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Schematic illustrating the effect of changes in T0 and T1 on ∂ζ/∂T0 for three scenarios.

Shown are three schematics representing typical annual cycles of temperature (leftmost plots) for a warm coastal region (top), region in the interior of a continent where the annual mean temperature is close to 0 C (middle), and a cold coastal region (bottom). Blue and red hatching indicates periods where T < 0 or T > 0, respectively. The rightmost plots are the same annual cycles, but for a 1 C increase in annual mean temperature. At far right is the resultant value of ∂ζ/∂T0.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evan, A., Eisenman, I. A mechanism for regional variations in snowpack melt under rising temperature. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 326–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00996-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00996-w

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation