Many recently updated climate models show greater future warming than previously. Separate lines of evidence suggest that their warming rates may be unrealistically high, but the risk of such eventualities only emphasizes the need for rapid and deep reductions in emissions.
Data availability
Data for Fig. 2, and additional figures comparing SSPs and RCPs, are available from https://github.com/Priestley-Centre/CMIP5_CMIP6_FaIR_gsat_data.
References
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Knutti, R., Rugenstein, M. A. A. & Hegerl, G. C. Nat. Geosci. 10, 727–736 (2017).
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2019/11/sensitive-but-unclassified/
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/new-climate-models-predict-warming-surge
Why results from the next generation of climate models matter. https://go.nature.com/2rU3E65
Bodas‐Salcedo, A. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 1735–1758 (2019).
Sellar, A. A. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739 (2019).
Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).
Smith, C. J. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 (2018).
Grose, M. R., Gregory, J., Colman, R. & Andrews, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1559–1566 (2018).
Sutton, R. T. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 1637–1642 (2019).
Swart, N. C. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-177 (2019).
Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J. & Séférian, R. Nature 571, 335–342 (2019).
Herger, N. et al. Earth Syst. Dynam. 9, 135–151 (2018).
Eyring, V. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1747–1802 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Jones, K. Tokarska, T. Mauritsen, A. Klein Tank, A. Gettelman, V. Eyring, C. Schleussner, J. Rogelj and J. Marotzke for discussions. Funding was provided by European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 820829 (CONSTRAIN) and UKRI NERC grant NE/N006038/1 (SMURPHS). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme, which, through its Working Group on Coupled Modelling, coordinated and promoted CMIP6. We thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for archiving the data and providing access, and the multiple funding agencies who support CMIP6 and ESGF. M. Schlund is thanked for providing CMIP ECS data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.M.F. conceived of the work and wrote the comment, with extensive contributions to both writing and ideas from A.C.M. C.M.M. provided the analysis of CMIP6 projections, made Fig. 2 and commented on the paper. C.J.S. provided the FaIR analysis and made Fig. 3.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, P.M., Maycock, A.C., McKenna, C.M. et al. Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 7–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Projected changes of compound droughts and heatwaves in China under 1.5 °C, 2 °C, and 3 °C of global warming
Climate Dynamics (2024)
-
A CMIP6 multi-model ensemble-based analysis of potential climate change impacts on irrigation water demand and supply using SWAT and CROPWAT models: a case study of Akmese Dam, Turkey
Theoretical and Applied Climatology (2024)
-
Estimating Soil Carbon Sequestration of Jatropha for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Pathway
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution (2024)
-
Trends in the atmospheric jet streams are emerging in observations and could be linked to tropical warming
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Evaluation of bias correction techniques for generating high-resolution daily temperature projections from CMIP6 models
Climate Dynamics (2023)