Skip to main content
Log in

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Improving reaction prediction

  • Meeting Report
  • Published:

From Nature Chemistry

View current issue Submit your manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 21 August 2020

This article has been updated

The use of automation for chemical research and reaction discovery has seen significant advances in recent years, but there are still problems that need to be solved. Ella M. Gale and Derek J. Durand discuss limitations in the field and how researchers are working to address these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: The process for taking input data through to continuous learning embedding.

Change history

References

  1. Segler, M., Preuss, M. & Waller, M. Nature 555, 604–610 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, L. Chemical and Engineering News https://cen.acs.org/articles/95/i25/ChemPlanner-integrate-SciFindern.html (2017).

  3. Rosales, A. R. et al. Nat. Catal. 2, 41–45 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai, A., Clifton, J., Diaconescu, P. L. & Fey, N. Chem. Commun. 55, 7021–7204 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spicer, R. L. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2134–2139 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grethe, G., Blanke, G., Kraut, H. & Goodman, J. M. J. Cheminform. 10, 22 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Press, L. S., Press, J. B. & Taylor, K. T. Graphical Representation Standards for Chemical Reactions (IUPAC Recommendations, 2019).

  8. GitHub https://github.com/PistoiaAlliance/UDM (2020).

  9. GitHub https://github.com/rsc-ontologies/rxno (2019).

  10. Bitbucket https://bitbucket.org/rscapplications/chemlistem/src/master/ (2020).

  11. Kanza, S. & Frey, J. G. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 14, 433–444 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Steiner, S. et al. Science 363, eaav2211 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Warr, W., Kanza, S., Frey, J. G. & Whitby, R. J. (eds) AI3SD, Dial-a-Molecule & Directed Assembly: AI for reaction outcome and synthetic route prediction conference report 2020 (University of Southampton, 2020)..

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ella M. Gale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gale, E.M., Durand, D.J. Improving reaction prediction. Nat. Chem. 12, 509–510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0478-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0478-4

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation