Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Science education in the 21st century

  • Perspective
  • Published:

From Nature Astronomy

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The traditional university science curriculum was designed to train specialists in specific disciplines. However, in universities all over the world, science students are going into increasingly diverse careers and the current model does not fit their needs. Advances in technology also make certain modes of learning obsolete. In the past ten years, the Faculty of Science of the University of Hong Kong has undertaken major curriculum reforms. A sequence of science foundation courses required of all incoming science students are designed to teach science in an integrated manner, and to emphasize the concepts and utilities, not computational techniques, of mathematics. A number of non-discipline-specific common core courses have been developed to broaden students’ awareness of the relevance of science to society and the interdisciplinary nature of science. By putting the emphasis on the scientific process rather than the outcome, students are taught how to identify, formulate, and solve diverse problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: An armillary sphere mobile app designed to help students understand the predictive power of the geocentric model.

Technology-Enriched Learning Initiative of the University of Hong Kong.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heffron, J. M. The knowledge most worth having: Otis W. Caldwell (1869–1947) and the rise of the general science course. Sci. Educ. 4, 227–252 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform (National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983).

  3. Jaffee, D. The general education initiatives in Hong Kong: organized contradictions and emerging tensions. High. Educ. 64, 193–206 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwok, S. Our Place in the Universe: Understanding Fundamental Astronomy from Ancient Discoveries. (Springer, Berlin, 2017).

  5. Adams, J. V. Student evaluations: the ratings game. Inquiry 1, 10–16 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E. & Wieman, C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332, 862–864 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank my HKU colleagues who helped me implement the curriculum reform at HKU, in particular N. K. Tsing and E. K. F. Lam, who were instrumental in the design of the science foundation courses. I am grateful to H. C. von Bergmann and C. Pennypacker of the Global Science Education Network for their advice on the reform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Kwok.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwok, S. Science education in the 21st century. Nat Astron 2, 530–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0510-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0510-4

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation