References
Abbatiello, S. E. et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2357–2374 (2015).
Addona, T. A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 633–641 (2009).
Selevsek, N. et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 739–749 (2015).
Collins, B. C. et al. Nat. Commun. 8, 291 (2017).
Koch, R. J. et al. Sci. Rep. 8, 11329 (2018).
Brunner, A.-D. et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 18, e10798 (2022).
Jha, S. G. et al. eLife 10, e66877 (2021).
Clark, N. M., Elmore, J. M. & Walley, J. W. Plant Physiol. 188, 726–737 (2022).
Uhlen, M. et al. Nat. Methods 13, 823–827 (2016).
Edfors, F. et al. Nat. Commun. 9, 4130 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank Z.-Y. Wang for editorial input and helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehta, D., Ahkami, A.H., Walley, J. et al. The incongruity of validating quantitative proteomics using western blots. Nat. Plants 8, 1320–1321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01314-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01314-8
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Considerations for reproducible omics in aging research
Nature Aging (2023)