The publication of two high-quality rose reference genomes opens new possibilities for a better understanding of the rise of the phenotypic diversity behind domestication.
References
Fougère-Danezan, M., Joly, S., Bruneau, A., Gao, X.-F. & Zhang, L.-B. Ann. Bot. London 115, 275–291 (2015).
Raymond, O. et al. Nat. Genet. 50, 772–777 (2018).
Saint-Oyant, L. H. et al. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0166–1 (2018).
Widrlechner, M. P. Econ. Bot. 35, 42–58 (1981).
Potter, J. The Rose. (Atlantic Books, London, 2012).
Wang, G. Acta Hortic. 751, 347–356 (2007).
Bendahmane, M., Dubois, A., Raymond, O. & Le Bris, M. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 847–857 (2013).
Martin, M., Piola, F., Chessel, D., Jay, M. & Heizmann, P. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102, 398–404 (2001).
Darwin, C. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication 1st edn (John Murray, London, 1868).
McClintock, B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 36, 344–355 (1950).
Gerats, A. G. et al. Plant Cell 2, 1121–1128 (1990).
Magnard, J.-L. et al. Science 349, 81–83 (2015).
Schulz, D. F. et al. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 401 (2016).
Iwata, H. et al. Plant J. 69, 116–125 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bombarely, A. Roses for Darwin. Nature Plants 4, 406–407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0195-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0195-9
- Springer Nature Limited