Abstract
Prolonged ischemic priapism presents a treatment challenge given the difficulty in achieving detumescence and effects on sexual function. To evaluate current practice patterns, an open, web-based multi-institutional survey querying surgeons’ experience with and perceived efficacy of tunneling maneuvers (corporoglanular tunneling and penoscrotal decompression), as well as impressions of erectile recovery, was administered to members of societies specializing in male genital surgery. Following distribution, 141 responses were received. Tunneling procedures were the favored first-line surgical intervention in the prolonged setting (99/139, 71.2% tunneling vs. 14/139, 10.1% implant, p < .001). Although respondents were more likely to have performed corporoglanular tunneling than penoscrotal decompression (124/138, 89.9% vs. 86/137, 62.8%, p < .001), penoscrotal decompression was perceived as more effective among those who had performed both (47.3% Very or Extremely Effective for penoscrotal decompression vs. 18.7% for corporoglanular tunneling; p < .001). Many respondents who had performed both tunneling procedures felt that most regained meaningful sexual function after either corporoglanular tunneling or penoscrotal decompression (33/75, 44.0% vs. 33/74, 44.6%, p = .942). While further patient-centered investigation is warranted, this study suggests that penoscrotal decompression may outperform corporoglanular tunneling for prolonged priapism, and that recovery of sexual function may be higher than previously thought after tunneling procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Dekalo S, Stern N, Broderick GA, Brock G. Priapism or prolonged erection: is 4–6 h of cavernous ischemia the time point of irreversible tissue injury? Sex Med Rev 2022;10:660–8.
Spycher M, Hauri D. The ultrastructure of the erectile tissue in priapism. J Urol 1986;135:142–7.
Bennett N, Mulhall J. Sickle cell disease status and outcomes of African-American men presenting with priapism. J Sex Med 2008;5:1244–50.
El‐Bahnasawy M, Dawood A, Farouk A. Low‐flow priapism: risk factors for erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 2002;89:285–90.
Zheng D-C, Yao H-J, Zhang K, Xu M-X, Chen Q, Chen Y-B, et al. Unsatisfactory outcomes of prolonged ischemic priapism without early surgical shunts: our clinical experience and a review of the literature. Asian J Androl 2013;15:75.
Long B, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Evaluation and management of acute compartment syndrome in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2019;56:386–97.
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Corona G, Hatzichristodoulou G et al. EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health. EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023; EAU Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Bivalacqua TJ, Allen BK, Brock G, Broderick GA, Kohler TS, Mulhall JP, et al. Acute ischemic priapism: an AUA/SMSNA guideline. J Urol 2021;206:1114–21.
Johnson MJ, Kristinsson S, Ralph O, Chiriaco G, Ralph D. The surgical management of ischaemic priapism. Int J Impot Res 2020;32:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0197-9.
Segal RL, Readal N, Pierorazio PM, Burnett AL, Bivalacqua TJ. Corporal Burnett “Snake” surgical maneuver for the treatment of ischemic priapism: long-term followup. J Urol 2013;189:1025–9.
Baumgarten AS, VanDyke ME, Yi YA, Keith CG, Fuchs JS, Ortiz NM, et al. Favourable multi‐institutional experience with penoscrotal decompression for prolonged ischaemic priapism. BJU Int 2020;126:441–6.
Garcia M, Porten S, Lue TF. Commentary on refractory ischemic priapism. Transl Androl Urol 2012;1:61.
Burnett AL, Pierorazio PM. Corporal “snake” maneuver: corporoglanular shunt surgical modification for ischemic priapism. J Sex Med 2009;6:1171–6.
Fuchs JS, Shakir N, McKibben MJ, Mathur S, Teeple S, Scott JM, et al. Penoscrotal decompression—promising new treatment paradigm for refractory ischemic priapism. J Sex Med 2018;15:797–802.
Elliott S. Re: penoscrotal decompression—promising new treatment paradigm for refractory ischemic priapism. J Urol 2020;203:1055–6.
Ortaç M, Çevik G, Akdere H, Ermeç B, Kadıoğlu A. Anatomic and functional outcome following distal shunt and tunneling for treatment ischemic priapism: A single-center experience. J Sex Med 2019;16:1290–6.
Sedigh O, Mazzoli S, Pizzuto G, Barale M, Preto M, Timpano M, et al. Early Implantation of Penile Prosthesis in the Ischemic Priapism.
Tausch TJ, Mauck R, Zhao LC, Morey AF. Penile prosthesis insertion for acute priapism. Urologic Clin 2013;40:421–5.
Falcone M, Gillo A, Capece M, Raheem A, Ralph D, Garaffa G. The management of the acute ischemic priapism: A state of the art review. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2017;41:607–13.
Zacharakis E, Garaffa G, Raheem AA, Christopher AN, Muneer A, Ralph DJ. Penile prosthesis insertion in patients with refractory ischaemic priapism: early vs delayed implantation. BJU Int 2014;114:576–81.
Ralph DJ, Borley NC, Allen C, Kirkham A, Freeman A, Minhas S, et al. The use of high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients presenting with priapism. BJU Int 2010;106:1714–8.
Patel PM, Slovacek H, Pahouja G, Patel HD, Cao D, Emerson J, et al. Socioeconomic disparities and risk factors in patients presenting with ischemic priapism: a multi-institutional study. Urology. 2022;163:50–55.
Lin H, Wang G, Wang R. Vacuum erectile device for penile rehabilitation. J Integr Nephrol Androl 2014;1:4.
Krughoff K, Bearelly P, Apoj M, Munarriz NA, Thirumavalavan N, Pan S, et al. Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature. Int J Impot Res 2022;34:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00373-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MEV: survey design, survey implementation, data review, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation. WJS, LCH, BTL, BPF: survey design, survey implementation, data review. EGJ: data review, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation. BMD, BNB, NVJ, DWB, GAJ: survey design, manuscript review and preparation. FAY, MF, SJH, AFM: survey design, survey implementation, manuscript review and preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
As this study collected no personal patient information and instead consisted of a survey of surgeon opinion, it was determined that ethics approval was not required.
Competing interests
Mikkel Fode: Boston Scientific (speaker). Steven Hudak: Boston Scientific (consultant). Allen Morey: Boston Scientific (consultant, speaker), Coloplast (consultant, speaker). Faysal Yafi: Coloplast (advisory board, speaker), Cynosure (consultant), Halozyme (advisory board, speaker), Masimo (intellectual property), Promescent (advisory board), sprout (consultant), Xialla (advisory board). The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
VanDyke, M.E., Smith, W.J., Holland, L.C. et al. Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?. Int J Impot Res 36, 62–67 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00808-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00808-z
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Comment on: “Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischaemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?”
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)
-
Comment on: current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)
-
Response to the comment on: “Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?”
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)