Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment on: “Scrotal approach for tunica expansion procedure (TEP) for penile girth and length restoration in patients with penile angulation due to Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: technique and outcomes”

  • Comment
  • Published:
International Journal of Impotence Research Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 17 December 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Razdan S, Zisman A, Valenzuela R. Scrotal approach for tunica expansion procedure (TEP) for penile girth and length restoration during penile prosthesis implantation in patients with penile angulation due to Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: technique and outcomes. Int J Impot Res. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00652-7.

  2. Akakpo W, Pineda MA, Burnett AL. Critical analysis of satisfaction asessment after penile prosthesis surgery. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5:244–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah T, Wang R. A review of factors affecting patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9:350–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziegelmann MJ, Farrell MR, Levine LA. Modern treatment strategies for penile prosthetics in Peyronie’s disease: a contemporary clinical review. Asian J Androl. 2020;22:51–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Falcone M, Preto M, Cocci A, Garaffa G. Strategies and current practices for penile lengthening in severe Peyronie’s disease cases: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:52–63.

  6. Shah BB, Kent M, Valenzuela R. Advanced penile length resotration techniques to optimize penile prosthesis placement outcomes. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9:641–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warner JN. A contemporary evaluation of peyronie’s disease during penile prosthesis placement: MOST, MUST, and More. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20:9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York University Langone Health, Department of Urology, New York, NY, USA

    Ari P. Bernstein & Joel Hillelsohn

  2. Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Urology, Bronx, NY, USA

    Justin Loloi

Authors
  1. Ari P. Bernstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justin Loloi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joel Hillelsohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to paper. Authors AB and JL contributed to analyzing data and writing papers and references. Author JH contributed and supervised the complete and final version of the paper and provided editing and revision guidance.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari P. Bernstein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernstein, A.P., Loloi, J. & Hillelsohn, J. Comment on: “Scrotal approach for tunica expansion procedure (TEP) for penile girth and length restoration in patients with penile angulation due to Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: technique and outcomes”. Int J Impot Res 36, 164–165 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00665-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00665-w

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation