Abstract
This study aims to analyze the reliability of #penisenlargement hashtag on Instagram and to investigate how young adult men perceive their penis size in real-world settings after being exposed to #penisenlargement Instagram postings. In the first phase, the credibility of the 100 most recent publicly accessible postings with the #penisenlargement hashtag was evaluated. Also, the last 1000 posts related to the same hashtag were evaluated to determine follower reach and engagement impacts. In the second phase, men were exposed to the #penisenlargement hashtag for 6 months and completed an online questionnaire examining their motives to undergo augmentation. Only a few (n = 6, 1%) posts had reliable information. At the time of questionnaire completion, participants reported a substantial drop in their genital self-image (22.3 ± 3.6 to 17.8 ± 3.0, p < 0.001) and a significant increase in their media exposure (1.24 ± 1.05 to 2.3 ± 0.74, p < 0.001) compared to their pre-Instagram exposure levels. The most prevalent reason for pursuing penis enlargement following Instagram exposure was to enhance self-perception and confidence. Our findings indicate that penis enlargement methods on Instagram are mostly unreliable. In addition, being exposed to posts pertaining to “penis enlargement” the hashtag can encourage men to seek penis augmentation surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, Muir GH, Natali A, Caldarera E, et al. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:283–6.
Sharp G, Oates J. Nonsurgical medical penile girth augmentation: a retrospective study of psychological and psychosexual outcomes. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:306–16.
Romero-Otero J, Manfredi C, Ralph D, Osmonov D, Verze P, Castiglione F, et al. Non-invasive and surgical penile enhancement interventions for aesthetic or therapeutic purposes: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2021;127:269–91.
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156:995–7.
Veale D, Miles S, Read J, Troglia A, Wylie K, Muir G. Sexual functioning and behavior of men with body dysmorphic disorder concerning penis size compared with men anxious about penis size and with controls: a cohort study. Sex Med. 2015;3:147–55.
Andrew P, Sara A. About three in ten US adults say they are almost constantly online. 26 Mar 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/26/about-three-in-ten-u-s-adults-say-they-are-almost-constantly-online/. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.
Brooke A, Monica A. Social media use in 2021. 7 Apr 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.
Deighton-Smith N, Bell BT. Objectifying fitness: a content and thematic analysis of #fitspiration images on social media. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2018;7:467–83.
Tiggemann M, Barbato I. “You look great!”: the effect of viewing appearance-related Instagram comments on women’s body image. Body Image. 2018;27:61–6.
Gul M, Diri MA. YouTube as a source of information about premature ejaculation treatment. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1734–40.
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e34.
Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. The development and validation of the Male Genital Self-Image Scale: results from a nationally representative probability sample of men in the United States. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1516–25.
Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. Factors that influence the decision to undergo labiaplasty: media, relationships, and psychological well-being. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:469–78.
Sharp G, Mattiske J, Vale KI. Motivations, expectations, and experiences of labiaplasty: a qualitative study. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:920–8.
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156:995–7.
Söylemez H, Atar M, Sancaktutar AA, Penbegül N, Bozkurt Y, Onem K. Relationship between penile size and somatometric parameters in 2276 healthy young men. Int J Impot Res. 2012;24:126–9.
Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoll J. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU Int. 2015;115:978–86.
García Gómez B, Alonso Isa M, García Rojo E, Fiorillo A, Romero Otero J. Penile length augmentation surgical and non-surgical approaches for aesthetical purposes. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:332–6.
Vardi Y, Har-Shai Y, Gil T, Gruenwald I. A critical analysis of penile enhancement procedures for patients with normal penile size: surgical techniques, success, and complications. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1042–50.
Bettocchi C, Checchia AA, Falagario UG, Ricapito A, Busetto GM, Cormio L, et al. Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:392–403.
Oates J, Sharp G. Nonsurgical medical penile girth augmentation: experience-based recommendations. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:1032–8.
Hehemann MC, Towe M, Huynh LM, El-Khatib FM, Yafi FA. Penile girth enlargement strategies: what’s the evidence? Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:535–47.
Califano G, Arcaniolo D, Ruvolo CC, Manfredi C, Smarrazzo F, Cilio S, et al. Glans penis augmentation: when, how, and why? Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:343–6.
Zaccaro C, Subirà D, López-Diez I, Manfredi C, Ascensios-Vargas JP, Moncada-Iribarren I. History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:327–31.
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz NC, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80:333–57.
Cilio S, Collà Ruvolo C, Turco C, Creta M, Capece M, La Rocca R, et al. Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTube(TM)” on Phimosis. Int J Impot Res. 2022:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00557-5.
Melchionna A, Collà Ruvolo C, Capece M, La Rocca R, Celentano G, Califano G, et al. Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information? Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00536-w.
Batur AF, Altintas E, Gül M. Evaluation of YouTube videos on primary bladder pain syndrome. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:1251–8.
Jonas WB, Kaptchuk TJ, Linde K. A critical overview of homeopathy. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:393–9.
Brennan J. Size matters: penis size and sexual position in gay porn profiles. J Homosexuality. 2018;65:912–33.
Sharp G, Oates J. Sociocultural influences on men’s penis size perceptions and decisions to undergo penile augmentation: a qualitative study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:1253–9.
Veale D, Miles S, Read J, Troglia A, Carmona L, Fiorito C, et al. Phenomenology of men with body dysmorphic disorder concerning penis size compared to men anxious about their penis size and to men without concerns: a cohort study. Body Image. 2015;13:53–61.
Sharp G, Fernando AN, Kyron M, Oates J, McEvoy P. Motivations and psychological characteristics of men seeking penile girth augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42:1305–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AÇ contributed to investigation, conceptualization, and writing—original draft preparation. MG contributed to investigation, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, and methodology.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Çağlayan, A., Gül, M. #Penisenlargement on Instagram: a mixed-methods study. Int J Impot Res 36, 218–222 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00646-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00646-5
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Using social media for male sexual health: what do we miss? A perspective article on good practices and missing evidence
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)
-
Size matters: characterizing penile augmentation content from the 100 most popular YouTube videos
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)
-
Social Media and Apps in Urology
Current Surgery Reports (2023)